3 Idiots fares well despite flaws
By not giving away the complete mystery, the ending is pretty humorous but at some time it felt as if it was too logical and predictable. This slight logicality is one of the weak points of the film which otherwise could have been a spotless show
THREE IDIOTS, one of the most awaited films for the year 2009, fared well in its first week, also the Christmas week. Fairly based on Chetan Bhagat’s best seller, Five Point Someone, 3 Idiots is about three youths studying engineering from one of the best engineering colleges in India, and how they become friends and eventually, soul mates. Although the story seems to be a mediocre one, it’s the treatment that wins it all for the director, Rajkumar Hirani. Having the privilege of watching the first show on the first day in a city like Pune, which houses many youngsters of India in the form of students, the audience response was one of the things worth noting.
Sharman Joshi did a tremendous job as Raju, and Madhavan as Farhan was super cool.
Aamir’s character called, Ranchoddas Shaymaldas Chajaad, completely lived up to it giving importance to all the minutest details as always. Kareena is again worth mentioning, as although her role is short, her performance was perfect. Boman Irani in another similar character, which even though has been repeated in so many of his films, has bettered his own performance each time.
Worthy of all praises, however, there are some glitches here and there during the end. It seemed as if all the teachings of Aamir Khan’s character during the movie found all its practical experience in the climax where he impressed the Dean as well. However, the interval was a little indigestible when the audience finds Aamir when found, turning into Javed Jaffrey. The common reaction of all was, “this better have a good explanation”. The post interval session however, went on smoothly and after the explanation of the mystery, people again started the search for Aamir Khan with intense curiosity, who had gone missing in the story after he had completed his graduation and no one knew where he was. The story itself started with the search of “Rancho”, the pet name given to Aamir’s character.
Not giving away the complete mystery, the ending is pretty humorous but at some time it felt as if it was too logical and predictable. This slight logicality is one of the weak points of the film which otherwise could have been a spotless show.
Worthy of all praises, however, there are some glitches here and there during the end. It seemed as if all the teachings of Aamir Khan’s character during the movie found all its practical experience in the climax where he impressed the Dean as well. However, the interval was a little indigestible when the audience finds Aamir when found, turning into Javed Jaffrey. The common reaction of all was, “this better have a good explanation”. The post interval session however, went on smoothly and after the explanation of the mystery, people again started the search for Aamir Khan with intense curiosity, who had gone missing in the story after he had completed his graduation and no one knew where he was. The story itself started with the search of “Rancho”, the pet name given to Aamir’s character.
Not giving away the complete mystery, the ending is pretty humorous but at some time it felt as if it was too logical and predictable. This slight logicality is one of the weak points of the film which otherwise could have been a spotless show.
 | Previous Post |
| Next Post |  |
.One of the glitches the reviewer lists out "the interval was a little indigestible when the audience finds Aamir when found, turning into Javed Jaffrey. The common reaction of all was, ������this better have a good explanation������. It did have an explanation, don't know if its good enough for the reviewer. Aamir Khan is the son of a gardener (mali) working for the faboulously rich ranchodas family. The elder ranchodas lacks education, therefore uses the intelligent rancho to fulfill his ambiton of seeing his son armed with an engineering degree. I think this explanation is good enough to buttress the point why Ranchodas is not the Ranchodas
thanks for ur comment abdul... but what i said is that the it was indigestible before any explanation was given. they had explained this part of the story only after interval... right? so we found it difficult to sit thru the break... tht is wat i meant by when i said this... anyway thanks for this clarification
Login
 Login through Social ID
|
