All natural resources are real wealth and they are the basis of life. If any law deprives one person from this fundamental right, then the person is entitled to life's rights and he is forced to slay those who have more than a huge amount (more than the original limit).

The obvious reason for this is that the person who wants to live independently should have his natural resources and if you want to give every person a free and self-sufficient life, then make a median wealth rights based on the basis of justice which should be the core of the system. 

If you link the wealth rights to the person's qualification and competence, then you directly support the unfair rights of a more powerful person, and the consequences is the weak and poor suffers. 

In view of justice, there should be a maximum limit for every person's rights and unless you do this in the Constitution, along with rules and laws, the weak person will not be able to save his right to justice. That is where; the poor can never be independent and self-sufficient and will not be able to save for future therefore he or she has to become slave for survival. 

People should understand this well that unless a person has the lack of natural resources, he cannot even use his hard work according to his ability and competence, and also does not end his shortage and misery.

Therefore, the real democracy can also be said to the same arrangement in which every person enjoys fundamental right to natural resources from birth to death equally, and in its absence, he has to accept any other person's unwanted thing.

It would be wrong that every person should be given rights natural resources, a person's labor is his or her own apart from the right to natural resources. If someone is less competence and ability than others, it will be an injustice to snatch one's fundamental wealth rights on that pretext. This is a sinful crime.

But you also know that any person with a wealth of wealth possesses the benefit of any labor without interest, it means that there is no connection with the hard work of the person and Weaker than a weak person should also be found without any intention.

This also means, if any person accumulates more wealth than the already determined ceiling due to utilization of ability and capacity, he or she is rightful to do that however it is in certain way a result of exploitation of the others ? the weak and poor populace. 

If you want to stop the exploitation of the weak people, consider a person as the owner of the wealth to already determined median ceiling of land holding. The wealth beyond that ceiling should be worth taxed according to the existing rate of interest on the wealth, and a part of it distributed to the citizens equally.

Therefore, recognition of Line of Wealth for justice is inevitable, and unless it is adopted and practiced, the fundamental right of the weak person on the natural resources should be insured. 

Therefore, the average or median wealth rights can be a peace deal that can establish peace and harmony between the people of society and establish love and intimacy, and to make all people happy, giving them a free, a cost-free life.

The author is economist and is founder of Economic Justice Foundation.