| Last updated less than one minute ago
Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
Follow Us
  
CJ: Anoop Saha
Total Reports : 4
Add to Favourite
Visit Anoop Saha page >>
Home > India > Article
Afzal: Letter for life
Mohammad Afzal�s wife wrote in defence of her convicted husband a letter in 2004 that alleges torture and humiliation that he and her family underwent while the apex court adjudicated on his crime against the nation.
 
Fri, Oct 06, 2006 00:00:00 IST
Views:
10924
   Comments:
101
Rate:  1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5 4 out of 5 5 out of 5 2.99 / 109 votes
 
WHILE IT IS tempting to dismiss this letter by Tabassum Guru, wife of Mohammad Afzal as a sob-story, as a pack of lies, or as a last-ditch attempt to gain public sympathy, I doubt anybody will dispute the fact that the Special Task Force (STF) in Kashmir has not committed any atrocities. Tabassum has taken explicit names of the STF personnel who demanded money from her. Why should we not demand any inquiry against them? Why should we remain silent spectators or participants in the “samuhik hatya (collective murder)”?
 
In the US, the only person convicted in the 9/11 hijacking case, Zacarias Moussaoui, was not given death penalty. The reason cited was his violent childhood. He was sentenced to life without parole. Can we take into account the tortures committed by STF on Md Afzal, and ask for his death penalty to be commuted? This is going to be a political, and, hence, a public decision. Let’s not be so blind in our hatred that we kill an individual without any fair trial, without reason.
 
I am reproducing the letter that reflects her points of view and was carried by Kashmir Times in its edition dated October 21, 2004:
 
“I am the wife of Mohammad Afzal, the man accused of conspiring to attack the Indian Parliament on December 13, 2001. Afzal has been condemned to death by Sessions Court Judge S N Dhingra and his death sentence has been confirmed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. Now the case has come up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
 
All over India people have condemned the attack on Parliament. And, I agree that it was a terrorist attack and must be condemned. However, it is also important that the people accused of such a serious crime be given a fair trial and their story be fully heard before they are punished. I believe that no one has heard my husband’s story and he has so far never been represented in the court properly.
I appeal to you to hear our story and then decide for yourselves whether justice has been done.
 
Afzal and my story is the story of many young Kashmiri couples. Our story represents the tragedy facing our people.
In 1990, Afzal was attracted to the movement led by the JKLF, like thousands of other youth. He went to Pakistan for training and stayed there for a little while. However, he was disillusioned by the differences among different groups and he did not support pro-Pakistani groups. He stayed there only three months without getting any training. Afzal returned to Kashmir and he went to Delhi to pursue his studies. He always wanted to study and before he joined the movement, he was doing his MBBS.
 
My husband wanted to return to normal life and with that intention he surrendered to the BSF. The BSF Commandant refused to give him his certificate till he had motivated two others to surrender. And, Afzal motivated two other militants to surrender. He was given a certificate stating that he was a surrendered militant. You will not perhaps realise that it is very difficult to live as a surrendered militant in Kashmir, but he decided to live with his family in Kashmir. In 1997, he started a small business of medicines and surgical instruments in Kashmir. The next year, we were married. He was 28 years old and I was 18.
 
Throughout the period that we lived in Kashmir, the Indian security forces continuously harassed Afzal and told him to spy on people they suspected of being militants. One Major Ram Mohan Roy of 22 Rashtriya Rifles tortured Afzal and gave him electric shocks in his private parts. He was humiliated and abused.
 
The Indian security forces used to regularly take Afzal to their camps and torture him. They wanted to extract information from him. One night, the Indian security forces came to our home and abused all of us and took away Afzal to their camp; another time he was taken to the STF camp Palhalan Pattan.
Some days later they took him to the Humhama STF camp. In that camp the officers, DSP Vinay Gupta and DSP Darinder Singh demanded Rs 1 lakh. We are not a rich family and we had to sell everything, including the little gold I got on my marriage to save Afzal from the torture.
 
Afzal was kept in freezing water and petrol was put into his anus. One officer, Shanti Singh, hanged my husband upside down for hours naked and in the cold. They gave electric shocks in his penis and he had to have treatment for days.
 
You will think that Afzal must be involved in some militant activities that is why the security forces were torturing him to extract information. But you must understand the situation in Kashmir — every man, woman and child has some information on the movement even if they are not involved. By making people into informers they turn brother against brother, wife against husband and children against parents. Afzal wanted to live quietly with his family, but the STF would not allow him.
 
You should also know that the STF force is notorious in Kashmir for extorting money from the people and they have become so infamous that when Mufti Sayed became the Chief Minister he promised in his election manifesto to disband the entire force. The STF is known for human rights violations, including killing people in their custody and brutal, senseless, inhuman torture.
It was under these conditions that forced Afzal to leave his home, family and settle in Delhi. He struggled hard to earn a living and he had decided to bring me and our four-year old son, Ghalib, to Delhi. Like any other family, we dreamed of living together peacefully and bringing up our children, giving them a good education and seeing them grow up to be good human beings. That dream was cut short when once again the STF got hold of my husband in Delhi.
 
The STF told my husband to bring one man Mohammad to Delhi from Kashmir. He met Mohammad and one other man, Tariq, there at the STF camp. He did not know anything about the men and he had no idea why he was being asked to do the job. He has told all this to the court, but the court chose to believe half his statement about bringing Mohammad, but not the bit that he was told to do so by the STF.
 
There was no one to represent Afzal in the lower court. The court appointed a lawyer who never took instructions from Afzal, or cross-examined the prosecution witnesses. That lawyer was communal and showed his hatred for my husband. When my husband told Judge Dhingra that he did not want that lawyer, the judge ignored him. In fact, my husband went totally undefended in the trial court. Whenever my husband wished to say something the judge would not hear him out and the judge showed his communal bias in open court.
 
In the High Court one human rights lawyer offered to represent Afzal and my husband accepted. But instead of defending Afzal the lawyer began by asking the court not to hang Afzal, but to kill him by a lethal injection. My husband never expressed any desire to die. He has maintained that he has been entrapped by the STF. My husband was shocked, but he had no way of changing his lawyer while being locked up in the high security jail. It was only after the High Court judgement was pronounced that he got to know about the way the lawyer had represented him. Afzal refused to accept the same lawyer for his appeal in the Supreme Court. I had no way of getting Afzal a lawyer. I do not know anyone in Delhi. Finally, Afzal wrote to the Defence Committee set up for Mr Geelani. I am annexing his letter. And, the Defence Committee helped Afzal to get a senior lawyer, Sushil Kumar. However, the Supreme Court cannot go into the evidence and so I do not know what will happen.
 
I appeal to you to ensure that my husband is not condemned to death and he is ensured a fair trial. Surely, your conscience will not allow you to be a party to the death of a fellow human being who has not been represented in the court and who has not had a chance to tell his story. The police have made him falsely confess before the media even before the trial started. They humiliated him, beat him, tortured him and even urinated in his mouth. I feel deep shame to talk about these things in public but circumstances have forced me. It has taken a lot of courage for me to put all this on paper, but I do so for the sake of my child who is now six years old.
Will you speak out at the injustice my husband has faced? Will you speak out on my behalf? I am, of course, fighting for my husband’s life, for the life of my son’s father. But I also speak as a Kashmiri woman who is losing faith in Indian democracy and its ability to be fair to Kashmiri Muslims."
 
Tabassum
Srinagar
September 2004
 
Two years later, I put the same questions to my friends: Will you speak out on her behalf?
 
Be a Citizen Journalist. Tell us your story. Let the world know the truth.


Voice your concern and share your opinion by participating in merinews’s ongoing debate on the topic: Mohammad Afzal Guru should be hanged.

 
Related Articles:
Print | Post comment
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Post your comment
Post
Posted comments (101)
 
I find it funny when people compare India with USA. The terror attack convict in USA was not given death sentence because of a violent child hood. But in USA, government has enough laws to ensure that childhood for all its citizens is healthy. They consider it the government responsibility to offer healthy growth to all children. And in this case government has accepted its own failure. USA is a different country, they have different economical, social and political structure. It is funny to try comparing yourself with them...In USA there are strip bars - are there any in India? In USA there government is transparent - is it in India? In USA military and police are better equipped than terrorism - is it in India?....USA has witnessed only one terror strike so far in history. And that one terror strike has called for stringent terror laws. So many new regulations has been created. And just based on one terror attack - USA has justified their attack on Afghanistan and Iraq. You can see that the terror convict in USA was released because of a violent childhood. But can not you see that USA has destroyed two entire countries without any significant reasons? India can ignore Afzhal if they have capability to destroy Pakistan. ...I do not understand why we Indians have such a tendency to get impressed by what USA does. We see that one terror convict was given relief because of violent childhood. And we start thinking that USA is a perfect world, its policies full of generosity and kindness for people. Truth is that they are only generous to their own citizens. They have destroyed two nations completely. Lacs of people have died - including thousands of USA defense personal. I believe that we Indians are more saner than Americans in this aspect. And we should handle our problems based on the social, economical, geographical and political factors prevalent in our country
 
 
| 31 August 2008
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
 
Did they asked the openion of the public or the wifes of the killed jawans before attacking the parlament or killing the innocent common people? No. Then why now? And if you want to take into account what Afzal's wife has to say, let us ask what the family members and relatives of the killed people want to say first.
 
 
| 17 February 2007
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
 
The framing of the above letter is fantastic. It's written in such a way that the common people will come to a conclusion that Afzal is totally innocent and the Armed forces made him to do all these things. She is telling that they went to pakistan for 3 months for training, but didn't take it. Then what they were doing in pakistan for 3 months. Were they playing cricket? Or were they preaching Gandhism in pakistan? Above all, it must be noted that even though the admit that they are involved in the parlament attack, they don't repent for the same. Why should the law give some sympathetic considerations for such a person?
 
 
| 17 February 2007
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
Live Debate
In its anti-encroachment drive shouldn't HUDA provide alternatives to the affected?
  Agree: 0% Disagree: 0%  
Participate Now
Latest in India
more...
 


Individual User Corporate User ( For submitting Press Release and Jobs )
Email / Login ID
Password
Forgot Password? Click here