Further, it’s an open secret that ministers indirectly influence the transfer and posting irrespective of state or centre and irrespective of the party in power. Thus such allegations are not new. Also ministers many a time protect powerful persons/businessmen if the evidences are bit week and personal connection is strong. FBI misinformation may be a goof up or irresponsible or may be due to some strategy. After all FBI didn’t contradict Shinde’s version.
In any case, while public wants end of such goof ups, indirectly influencing in transfer and postings (amounting to corruption) etc, public too doesn’t accept allegations without evidence. Questions always rise why R.K. Singh didn’t oppose that time?
Another whistleblower IAS officer Ashok Khemka never compromised and revealed all the wrong things in public. Thus he always remains credible. Singh’s silence during his service and alleging only after joining a party simply amount to opportunism.
Thus BJP needs to understand this and refrain from creating hue and cry using R.K. Singh’s revelations. Singh must also realize that in public sphere credibility is utmost requirement. Such credibility can only be earned when one’s accusation and comments are supported by evidence and commensurate to his past deeds.
The most popular citizen journalists' reports on merinews chosen automatically on the basis of views and comments