Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
American hypocrisy at its worst
Reading some of the information coming out of the American think tanks amaze me. The way some of their essays are written, one does not have to ponder for hours what they try to imply. Their hypocrisy extends everywhere you look at. It supports and arms dictators while calling for freedom and democracy in the countries whose governments do not budge to its diktats.

ONE RECENT essay that I read, covered China and how it viewed the US. In that particular essay, it is suggested that the Chinese government explains its intentions to the US citizens. In another point, the essay’s authors say that while United States is stationing its troops in nearby countries and signing defence treaties with them, the Chinese should not be scared.

So for me and my henchmen to surround you, it is not a method of intimidation but rather it’s meant for peace. Does anyone really buy that? What hypocrisy. In the same essay it is suggested that the United States can harm China’s progress by imposing economic sanctions on the country but would it really help the US interests? Most of the manufacturing is done in China today even if the companies are based in Japan, South Korea, United States or Europe for that matter. Harming China economically would only hurt US interests all over the world. China and the World Economy are so intermingled today that it is next to impossible to differentiate between the two. The two for now cannot exist without the other.

The United States in its time as the global hegemon has learned to bully and intimidate the world. They want the world to accept their terms and conditions even though they do not bring anything to the table. They say that they will give their approval but who to catch hold of if they retreat from their position. A country that could somewhat sell its ally of 50 years in favour a new emerging power can do anything to protect its interests.

Regarding the case of China, the United States has the largest force based in the Pacific Command which they regard as their own backyard. Pacific Command includes a force numbering 325,000 that includes people of the armed forces as well as the civilians plus 1900 aircraft and 180 ships. Add to that the stationing of forces in Afghanistan, defence treaties with Taiwan, Philippines and other countries in the Pacific including Australia and New Zealand.

The hypocrisy of the United States extends to everywhere you look. The United States supports and arms dictators while calling for freedom and democracy in the countries with whose governments they do not agree with. After Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba in the revolution of 1959, the CIA with the approval of US government launched an invasion of the country in 1962 with disastrous results for the CIA. Another example would be its stand on Iran. It criticises Iran for its lack of implementation and violations of human rights while constantly supporting and providing the dictatorial, non-democratic regimes of many Arab countries with weapons. The US had been a major supporter of Meles Zenawi’s regime in Ethiopia, a regime that has been widely criticised for its human rights abuses.

Another point to be noted is the fact that the United States was one of the major advocates that pushed for the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. What needs to be checked is the fact that this Universal Declaration only caters to what the West thinks should be and it does not respect any other culture or its tradition.

Getting back to China, in the past few decades, the Chinese have never shown any intention of any aggressive behaviour but this has only been conjured up by the American press and their so called specialists and experts. China is still following their policy of defending their sovereignty. What country doesn’t? For the United States, the issue of sovereignty does not only apply to the mainland but everywhere. If a power rises anywhere in the world, it is a threat to the United States National Security.

And in recent years, the war on terror initiated by the United States seems to be farce. Take for example the drone strikes in tribal areas of Pakistan. Terrorism is referred to as the use of violence to incite fear among the masses. The United States in doing just that in its use of drones in Pakistan. The people in those areas are terrified, and by people I refer to the civilian population of the country, fearing that they might be targeted next. Imagine living in a constant fear of death for no particular reason.

India must realise that United States is more of an opportunist than an ally and should treat the country as such. For the Chinese, the United States has no reason to tell them what they should and shouldn’t do. It is their country and their government. To end this opinion, I will just put across this example that if China wanted to bully its neighbours and project its military might in the South and East China Sea, it could have bought Aircraft Carriers or manufactured the same, for it had the resources to proceed but it didn’t. Need I say more?

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.