Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
Banning an organisation is undemocratic
Democracies thrive on the plurality of opinions and it is from this utter chaos of voices that the democratic order emerges. To ban an organisation, hits at the very root of the principles of democracy
DEMOCRACY PROMOTES and revels in disorderly chaos, and thrives on the order that emerges out of this ruckus. However, every now and then things spin out of control, and it is then that the state intervenes. And if it’s an organised outfit to blame, the first thing we seem to seek is a blanket ban on the activities of such organisation. But what exactly do such bans do? Fundamentally, they seek to choke the banned organisation into submission. And this runs counter to the principles, on which democracy – any democracy – is found upon.

The violation of peace and order must be seen as a law and order problem and should necessarily be dealt with accordingly. To assume that the very existence of an organisation is against public interest is like saying that only ’meaningful and productive’ talk is allowed and one should remain gagged till the time he or she comes up with something that makes sense. It’s after lots of nonsensical thoughts and words back and forth that something seminal emerges. To muffle the stupid is to kill the genius.

Therefore, banning an organisation – be it Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) or the Bajrang Dal (BD) – is a completely undemocratic exercise. And irrespective of the justification tendered, such bans gnaw at the very foundation of the democratic structures across the world. After all, as Martin Luther puts it, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Let’s not do a disservice to the plurality of opinion innate in the very concept of democracy. In the long run, tolerance to unpalatable opinions would pay well.

Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
Ramesh Manghirmalani
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.