While it has led to massive disappointment and anger in western media, journalists in India too feel that the directive will set a bad precedent for independent press coverage. Nishath Nizar, a sports journalist said, “It is also an attack on independent photographers. They (BCCI) should not mind as to how the photos are exactly used. It is obvious that the BCCI are flexing their muscles.”
In order to fill the void, in the absence of images, some UK newspapers like The Telegraph are using cartoons/ illustrations in protest. A cursory look at today's English newspapers, and one can observe that Hindustan Times and The Times of India have used pictures shot by their own staffers.
BCCI is providing photographs for editorial use, which can be downloaded from its website, but most of the media houses are not going the BCCI route.
Anshuman Gaekwad, former Indian cricketer said, “Instead of this, a notification should have been sent to syndication services stating that if the series photographs were used for non -editorial use then they would be penalised.”
Gaekwad added an interesting point: “The BCCI has to stop spectators carrying camera and mobiles along with them, as they can easily use it for commercial purposes as well.” With such kind of guidelines, the BCCI seems to have gone to far, but as usual, it is always the filthy rich BCCI, which can afford to think of taking such a stance. Gaekwad feels that it is okay 'unless the players themselves object to it'.
Apart from this, the BCCI also demanded a huge sum of money, GBP 50,000 from Sky TV to host them in the field, which was rejected by the latter. Hence, they are commentating from live feed they receive, which is bizarre for a channel like Sky TV, which has been known for providing the best coverage in the United Kingdom. This is nothing but cash rich BCCI acting as the 'big dada' of international cricket.
The most popular citizen journalists' reports on merinews chosen automatically on the basis of views and comments