Chidambaram escapes judicial net now
The Supreme Court has seized the matter relating to police atrocities on peaceful satyagrahis in Ramlila Maidan on June 11. However, it did not wish to widen the scope of investigation at present.
THE SUPREME Court on July 25 2011 declined to issue a notice to the Union Home Minister, P. Chidambaram to clarify the circumstances under which he gave a green signal to the Police to swoop down on the sleeping Satyagrahis in the Ramlila Maidan on the night of June 4th/5th 2011.
At the last hearing, the Division Bench of Justice B.S. Chauhan and Justice Swatanter Kumar had heard the plea of Swami Ramdev's counsel, Ram Jethmalani that the police atrocities on men, women and children was carried out at the behest of P. Chidambaram, Union Home Minister and that it was a government decision.
The counsel had pressed for issuance of a notice to the Home Minister so that the Apex Court could know what the reasons for a baton charge on a sleeping assembly of Satyagrahis were. The Apex Court had said that the matter may be considered on 25 July 11 when the case would come up for a hearing.
At this hearing, the judges said that as of now the aim was to know under what circumstances the police lathi charged on the satyagrahis who were sleeping there. The Apex Court does not wish to widen the area of investigation beyond that at this point of time. In the legal circles this development is being interpreted as a temporary relief to P. Chidambaram, Home Minister. He may be summoned later to present his side of the picture, if circumstances so require.
In my opinion, the Supreme Court does not wish to castigate the Executive too much in view of their protest in the form of a Review petition against the order of another Division Bench that had sharply criticised the government of India for going slow in the Black Money case and in the case of stashing of money in foreign banks to avoid taxes and also allied matters.
The government of India has submitted its point of view that the Constitution of India recognises division of power and responsibility between the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary.
The three pillars of democracy should respect each other and confine their activity to their respective turf.
The Apex Court is yet to hear that review petition but it certainly has set the ball rolling for observing Judicial Restraint and allow the Executive to make its own decision in its area of constitutional responsibility.
Thus in the coming few months, nay weeks, the Apex Court will redefine the relationship between the Executive and the Judiciary. Where will the Judicial Activity not intrude into the area of responsibility and where the Judiciary can act in the field of Executive if the latter has abdicated its responsibility.
The judges of the Supreme Court interpret the Constitution of India and make a decision, which is as good as law passed by the Parliament of India.
Login  Login through Social ID |
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.
