Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
Devyani Khobragade case reflects our Indian attitude towards the less privileged
Ever since the case of Devyani Khobragade grabbed headlines in the print and broadcast media, everyone was shocked with initial reports highlighting the horrific behaviour of the US towards the diplomat. The highly vocal media crying for an apology from the US and the unexpected courage of the Indian administration to raise eyebrows over an action by the US was sufficient to make the issue an inquisitive one.

However unlike others, honestly, I didn't have much interest in this particular issue as it simply appeared to me like a 'bhoolbhooleya' from the very beginning. The only thing that made me take notice was her striking look. Her father’s cross channel appearance though sometime would stop me for a while to stay in that particular news channel but my lookout was for the ''why'' of this entire issue compared to other thnings.

Poll
Has India's image of being a very soft state encouraged US to harras Devyani Khobragade?
Yes :
100 %
No :
0 %
Can't say :
0 %
Sponsored By :
Finally I read an article written by eminent columnist Shobha De in a Mumbai daily “Mumbai Mirror,” that gave me clear idea of this story.

The story is very simple. It is a case of two women, where one is the employer (Devyani) and the other is her domestic help (Sangeeta Richard). There were some irregularities between them regarding salary and wages, which lead Sangeeta to abandon her employer’s place and finally lodge a legal case against her. Then the ugly arrest episode took place, which stirred the Indian media . This led to a “prestige issue.”

The entire episode was revolving around Devyani, because of her high profiled stature backed by an influential IAS officer father with a strong political connection. But did we ever focus on the other version of the story - the maid involved in the entire issue? What happened to her in that diplomat’s home? What made her betray her employer? Did any observer, columnist or human right activists ever tried to find out Sangeeta’s side?

The fact is that unlike in India where we preach equality but practice the opposite, as we rarely recognize domestic helps as normal human beings. But, in America it is a serious crime, if a maid is not properly paid with their salary and wages. So their action was as per their legal system, both the ladies has to abide by the law of the land they stand.

Isn’t it a proof of our unfair attitude towards a big segment of our population (maids or domestic helps) who are truly hard working but unjustly deprived? We never treat them as human and their rights to live a life of dignity are not even a slightest concern in our mind. We feel as if we are doing a favor to them by employing them and expect them to be voiceless and submissive even to our exploitations.

Here in this case the only differentiator is that Sangeeta was aware of her legal stand in America and was courageous enough to fight for justice, which appeared absurd to our prejudiced mind (she is just a maid!!). We may guess that she was tutored but the naked truth is that Devyani flouted the local law and a made a huge mistake, which is considered as a serious crime in America.

In fact Devyani, who holds such a top post as an important representative of India should have known better, which could have avoided the spiteful muddle out there. Isn’t it? Isn’t it totally unjustified, baseless and quite irrational by Indian administration making it an issue, which may raise a debate to “Indo-US relation.'' Is there any ground to it???

Coming to the point, things are changing now and we must come out of the shell of traditional mindsets of treating domestic helps as “servant.'' They are very much human with same set of dreams, needs and feeling as we do and their rights are equally legitimate.

If Devyani is an Indian then Sangeeta is equally the same - Indian. Is it fair when we judge them as per their stature???

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of merinews.com. In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
COMMENTS (2)
Guest
Name
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
}
Sign in to set your preference
Advertisement

Interesting content

merinews for RTI activists

Create email alerts

Total subscribers: 208212
Advertisement
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.