While the Congress termed it yet another "popular sop" to farmers in the run-up to Lok Sabha polls, social scientists and farmers questioned its merits. Dr Harish Puri, former professor at the Guru Nanak Dev University, said it was a "retrograde step" as it would not help farmers tide over the problem of indebtedness. Coming in the wake of the elections, he said, the decision surely had political overtones and "did not appear to be a well-meaning exercise to redress the plight of farmers".
Dr Ravi Vasishtha of the Panjab University feared the decision could trigger more suicides. He said a large number of farmers with small land holdings had a debt of Rs 2 lakh in Punjab. The government’s decision could drive distressed farmers to suicide to their families tide over the crisis. The per capita debt for over 11 lakh farmers in the state is Rs 41,000, totalling Rs 25,000 crore. JS Jethuke, a farmer’s leader, said giving money to farmers after they had killed themselves was no solution. He demanded a long-term policy to free farmers from the stranglehold of middlemen.
Many farmers’ leaders feel that in the absence of a state government exercise to identify suicide cases, the schemes might prove an eye- wash. There is widespread discrepancy in farmer suicide figures. The Punjab government pegs the number of farmer suicides since 1988 to 2,116, while Chandigarh-based NGO Movement Against State Repression (MASR) says it is 40,000. MASR convener Inderjit Singh Jaijee said a survey conducted some time back in Andana and Lehra blocks of Sangrur found 1,130 suicides since 1988. MASR also conducted surveys in Mansa, Patiala and Amritsar. Except Patiala, suicides were high everywhere.
If 1,130 had committed suicide in just two blocks, the number would not be less than 40,000 in all the 138 blocks. The government, however, said the figures are grossly exaggerated. Police verification did not substantiate MASR’s claims. Jaijee, on the other hand, offered to produce death certificates to testify the figure.