Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
'He can rape, he can kill, but he can't be tried' as he is a juvenile
The most brutal assaulter in the Delhi gang rape could walk a free man after three years of correction process since he is a juvenile of 17 years and 6 months. This has outraged the entire nation and obviously the victim's family is disheartened. People are questioning laws of the country more now as they want to know on what grounds the culprit should not be tried in the same way as the other five accused.

Talking to a criminal lawyer, this citizen journalist tried to understand the legalities of the matter and whether a bone ossification test will actually help the victim's family. Advocate Sushil Bajaj cleared the fact that bone ossification test is one of the legal guides to determine a person's age but there are grey areas in it. Elaborating on the matter he said, “There are two ways to get a person's age determined- birth certificate and the test. But since the test has a margin of error on both sides, hence it is not conclusive.”

He also said: “This is a perfect legal aid but different people's bones develop in different ways so there is always an area of speculation and with the current case, it may not advance the victim's case substantially.”

Twitterati were outraged and criticised the Juvenile Board's order and supported the victim's family. The fact that according to the law, the sixth accused would be tried separately and could be put into remand home did not go well with the majority of the people.

One tweeple wrote, “Gangrape case's no longer about justice to a poor dead soul but about whether or not the (arguably) juvenile rapist/murderer can be reformed,” while another Twitter user could not help but comment, “He knew how to rape, he knew how 2 kill and he knew about how 2 wipe out proofs" The Curious Case Of Juvenile Rapists!” A well known singer and musician, Vishal Dhadlani also tweeted, “The 'juvenile accused in the Delhi gangrape case, might get away with just 3 years for his crime! Great way to 'discourage' rape!”

Such rage against the legal system and in the light that the case is exceptionally horrific, shouldn't we make an exception? Advocate Bajaj didn’t agree, and said, “There is no constitutional mandate to make an exception. Making exception is a slippery slope. If we make exception for one case, others will demand it too.”

When asked whether this means we can do nothing about the situation, he replied, “ We can always revisit the law but in spite of knowing that this is a horrendous case, I am not convinced to change the law for it as the law is not made overnight. A lot of consideration goes into it and it should not be changed for one particular case overnight.”

COMMENTS (0)
Guest
Name
Email Id
Verification Code
merinews for RTI activists
In This Article
bajaj
(161 Articles)
twitter
(730 Articles)

Create email alerts

Total subscribers: 205629
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.