Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
How political is President Pranab Mukherjee in his approach?
President Mukherjee while addressing the nation on the eve of the Republic Day this year made three important comments about major political options. First he criticized the incumbent; the Indian National Congress (INC)- led UPA2 government, the government whose part he was once land he almost predicted its ouster.

He said, “Corruption is a cancer that erodes democracy, and weakens the foundations of our state. If Indians are enraged, it is because they are witnessing corruption and waste of natural resources. If governments do not remove these flaws, voters will remove governments.”

Then he made an almost direct criticism of the AAP and many of the regional parties. He said, “Government is not a charity shop. Populist anarchy cannot be a substitute for governance. False promises lead to disillusionment, which gives birth to rage, and that rage has one legitimate target: those in power.”

In the end he mildly criticized the BJP. He said, “We live in a turbulent part of the world where factors of instability have grown in the recent past. Communal forces and terrorists will still seek to destabilize the harmony of our people and the integrity of our state but they will never win.”

Those who watched the address and still remember it or have read the transcript of the speech would conclude that President Mukherjee during his overall speech favored the BJP over the INC, the AAP and rest of the parties. This becomes clearly and explicitly evident as he favored the formation of a stable next government which can complete its full term.

Except for miracles the INC-led alliance does not appear to be doing so. The AAP’s performance is still in doubt and probably much inflated by the mainstream media. Therefore, it is probably the BJP-led alliance which could give India its rightful place among the community of nations and fulfill the dreams of well over a billion people.

Mukherjee’s speech tells at the compulsion of Presidents: that they may have to use arguments against their own former governments and parties. The speech reflects the arrival of the institutional objectivity in Indian establishment though there have been many precedents in the past too.

The Presidents can have little influence and impact on which party or alliance should form the government except in those cases where their discretion is much required. Even in those circumstances he and she would like to act objectively, impartially and fairly without remembering who voted him and her into the Raisina Hill.

But should Presidents of India take political sides? In particular, should they express their opinions about the viability of various political options? Sure, the INC-led UPA 1&2 have been corrupt right from the top to the bottom and all along but then Mukherjee was once part of it as late as in 2012. Or was he just trying to calm down the popular anger and resentment among the masses of India against the incumbent Union government? In both cases the President was trying appearing to play a bit of politics.

As per to the precision of textbooks, Presidents are not supposed to play much politics while in office till a constitutional crisis breaks down in New Delhi or in other state capitals. The same is not true at present as the country is not facing any urgent impending constitutional crisis at least at Union level. Probably, Mukherjee wanted to be honest and frank.

But then he is no intellectual and instead the figurehead of the biggest democracy in the world. Presenting or accounting for popular sentiments as a statesman or as a psychiatrist or both is not the best of President’s job. However, President have to state something relevant during their addresses to the nation on the eves of Republic Day and Independence Day as the guardian of Indian Constitution and its various state institutions and that is what Pranab Mukherjee did on 25 January, 2014.

He tried to be as impartial and as objective as he could be but in doing so he touched all political opinions rather deeply, intrinsically, fully and exhaustively. In fact he may cast his vote- for the INC but still against it. At the same time he criticized the BJP, the AAP, many of the regional parties for one reason or another.

But in essence Mukherjee’s comments are rather real and genuine. In fact, all political opinions have some pluses and some minuses for many among those who can think and do so rather independently and objectively. There are not clear-cut choices for many thinking brains.

I think that the upcoming general elections would be rather peaceful and full of complexity and the public of India all across the nation would choose the best among the candidates in their respective constituencies. President Mukherjee would hope to preside over a better government, even if it means a government-led a party he was not part of  earlier.

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.