To improve the quality of education, it is imperative to first realise what kind of education and creation of society is desired. Furthermore, any qualitative change is unpredictable and hence is analytical and emergent rather than prescriptive.
OF LATE, there has been a lot of talk about improving the quality of education in our country. Consequently, some institutions are trying to bring about changes in their organisational structures and instructional processes. However, it needs to be understood that qualitative improvement can neither be prescribed nor ordered.
It needs to be decided first that what kind of education and society we are talking about. Furthermore, any qualitative change is unpredictable and hence is analytical and emergent rather than prescriptive. Moreover, quality requires transitional planning and management towards improvement or change. It is desirable that the organisation (senior and middle level functionaries), instead of directly controlling the change, make it participative. Also, once all the functionaries have become receptive of the change, their capacities should be sensitively developed to enable them to take over the change process.
For qualitative improvement, the organisation has to do the following things deliberately -
Promoting self-development, development of capacities of the functionaries and fostering confidence in them to affect change.
Involving the functionaries in the diagnosis of problems and their solutions through participatory processes.
Reviewing the improvement periodically to learn from the experience of change and convert the feedback into further improvement.
Thus, the role of the upper and middle level functionaries in the change process is to become the supportive and facilitative structures to encourage experimentation, risk-taking and capacity-building. In other words, the upper and middle functionaries must become facilitators of and co-partners in the change process instead of its controllers and coordinators.