Welcome Guest, Login   
 Home |  World | India | Sports | Business | Technology | Entertainment | Lifestyle | Potpourri | Reviews | Press Releases | Interviews | Citizen Journalism
Home > Business > Article
India on green turf
India has a huge opportunity to make money. This is, by aligning its policies on eco-friendly lines and switching over to pollution-free articles. The earlier the govt does this, the larger market share the companies will be able to capture.
 
Wed, Sep 17, 2008 22:28:09 IST
Views:
1593
   Comments:
1
Rate:  1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5 4 out of 5 5 out of 5 5.0 / 1 votes
ONE OF the biggest battles the world is fighting today is “global warming”. India has a big hidden opportunity, to cash onto the situation. With the reduction in the greenhouse emission, the nation can make good money.

India is fourth largest carbon dioxide emitter of the world, with emission of 1.34 billion tonnes. China leads the charts here as well (6.2 billion tonne) followed by America (6 billion tonne) and Russia (1.5 billion tonne) at the third position. Beijing and New Delhi are arguing on the point that per their per capita incomes are one of the lowest. If we wait to raise our per capita income to that of the developed countries like America, we will convert our planet into planet of carbon.

An opportunity has been sensed by the businessmen of the nation. The leaders among them are Suzlon Energy and Tata BP Solar. Area of focus of Suzlon Energy is to convert wind energy into electrical energy. This is one of the eco-friendly methods to produce electricity, which is gathering momentum today. Initial investment to install the equipment, the basic equipment cost is high compared to thermal energy, but the cost is recovered in three-four year. It takes Rs 3 crore to produce one MW energy from coal and around Rs 20 crore to produce the same amount of energy using wind. Tata BP solar converts solar energy to the usable energy at home. The problem here is same, high initial cost. Water resources to produce hydro-electricity are not optimally utilised. When the focus will shift to these eco-friendly methods to produce electricity, it will be a complete win-win situation. First and foremost it will create employment opportunities. Followed by reduction in CO2 emission and thus, branding India as a eco-friendly emerging economy.

The path to create a pollution-free nation is not as easy as it seems to be. This is because of the vested interest of few decision makers. Thermal power plants, which work at 21 per cent efficiency (15 per cent less then the global standard) and which emits 53 per cent of the total CO2 emission of the nation are being run without any improvement.

Coal being used for power generation is of low quality, only for personal gains of few. The new technology improves the efficiency by 5-7 per cent and increases initial cost of 10 per cent, which is still a profitable deal. The nation is again beaten upon the policy front. The government is not implementing policies, which boost energy sector, especially the companies producing power in the eco-friendly manner. It is not providing subsidies to enhance the research and development (R & D) work in this area. Money is diversified to agriculture sector, again for political gain. Government should reduce taxes on the hybrid and electric cars. Civic hybrid is the latest example in the list, where the govt. charges cent percent import duty, thus discouraging people from purchasing it. Sooner the government wakes up and rises above the self interest, earlier it will brighten up the bottom-line of the companies.

To reduce the CO2 emission is the global priority. The government has to chalk out policies on this line itself. The earlier the government does this, the larger the market share, the companies will be able to capture.

 E-mail | Print | Post comment
 
Post your comment
Post
Posted comments (1)
 
The writer on this good article is further requested to come out withmore related articles specifying clearly ALL THE OPTIONS THAT ARE OPEN TO USTODAY TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY VIS-A-VIS COST OF PRODUCING ONE MW ON EACH OFTHESE OPTIONS. I note from the above article, cost of producing one MW energy(1) through coal route it is Rs.3 crores and (2) through wind route it is Rs.20 crores.Can we have more of such figures like what it would cost (3) through solar power route???(4) through nuclear enriched uranium route???? (5) through ocean waves' route?????(6) through recyling mode of all urban wastes for producing electricity??????(7) throughH20-water route - some Japanese are already doing research onto this?????(8) through fossilfuel oil ?????????(9) through use of natural gas route???? (10) ETC. ETC.
 
 
|
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
Hello,I appreciate your way to jolt down the amount required to produce energy by all eco-friendly way but it is not the only way to take a step ahead. Population density of India is very high. Hence the space will always be consideration. Also due to improper land acquisition rules it wont be easy to acquire large mass of land as seen in Singur's case. Government polices need to be deviced on the similar lines. The cost is just one of the factor of consideration...
|
Thanks for your prompt feedback. Since you are referring todensity population and space constraint - WHY NOT THE GOI(Government of India) seriously plan to mandate usage ofplenty-plenty-plenty of OPEN SPACE AVAILABLE. What we areseeing today is there is a mad scramble for horizontalspace in many cities and towns AND THEREFORE THE CRUNCH of spaceAND HIGH PRICE. What we are neglecting is there is so muchof vertical space i.e. perpendicular to the horizantal planelying vacant. If both our urban and rural development Ministrystart recognising the value and importance of vacant verticalspace available in abundance, I am sure, many of the issueswill be resolved. Today valuation is done only for the horizontal space touching the land mass directly but novaluation is done for the OPEN VERTICAL SPACE WHICH SEEM TO BEAVAIALBEL IN PLENTY.......... In my opinion, this is a BIGWASTE THAT IS GOING UNCHECKED. Just imagine, for example, with one or twofloor housing norms, roughly 1000 families are spread over 1000 multiplied1000 = 1000000 sq. ft area of land in a tier 2 town. Each housing is taken at 1000 sq. ft. areaThe same 1000 families can beaccommodated through multistoried housing each having 10 floors(minimum) which means the land area required will be that much lessie.1000 multiplied by 100 sq. ft area = 100000 sq. ft. area. Thedifference is 1000000 sq. ft. area minus 100000 sq. ft area = 9000000 sq. ft. area (a big saving). To match with the growing population thisis the best solution. Thanks, VMS
|
Loading
Latest in Business