Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
Mauritius, an example how FDI changed lives of people for good
The Indian political leadership seems to have lost the plot and is groping in the dark; it has become intellectually bankrupt with no clarity of vision. It is a paradox for a population of about 1.4 billion people with a civilizational legacy of thousands of years.

THE CONGRESS Party is exhausted with only one obsession – the prince who still has not grown up but well surrounded with loyalists and sycophants - hell bent to promote him as monarch since the Congress-wallahs do not see beyond the dynasty, and for that Indians at large seem to endorse dynastic politics.

Advertisement
Look at the states like Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. The political parties are littered with dynastic families. Long live the new maharajas! The leadership of the opposition at the central level is no better either. It is as well old, rudderless and leaderless. The old minds are senile yet attempting to hang on by clinging over non issues.

Is there any one sincerey and honestly concerned about common man’s welfare; with the aspiration of the nation? Is there any leader or party who would wish to propel Indians into the third millennium? The provincial level political parties are but a desperate group only with the throne of Delhi in mind. Well that’s democracy.

All those Indian political gurus and economists opposing the FDI in retail must visit my small island Republic of Mauritius and discover for themselves the changes brought into the lifestyle of the poor segment of the society and the environment at large. More so in hygiene…...of life!

I shall dwell not on a long prescription or on the merits of globalization or on the demise of the traditional shops or lament on the failures of Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal taking the population backwards. Remember the Tatas episode.

There is nothing permanent in life. In India and Indian society there is one exception. Caste is permanent. I can understand the resistance to change. FDI in retail will bring people from all backgrounds rubbing shoulders together. A blow to Brahminism!

It would though not eliminate the caste divide. Hindus are hierarchical. It shall continue to persist for many reasons. However, the organized retail sector shall definitely benefit everyone. It will bring different people from different backgrounds together rubbing shoulders. Which the neo - Brahminism does not want?

First, in our small place, it has provided decent regulated employment to thousands of young men and women at various levels and the interaction has narrowed the caste divide and resulted in many love stories and marriages across the lines. They dress up smartly in smart uniforms provided by the establishments; develop new clinical language with smiles and cheerfulness glowing on the cheeks, greeting customers with courtesy and politeness and taking home newly acquired social skills shared by their families and society.

Second, the Super and Hyper markets have generated demands for fresh vegetables, fruits, dairy products, poultry, mutton, fish et al, buying directly from the producers on regular basis or from supply chains who in turn have created thousands of jobs with emphasis on quality. The agriculture in turn is providing sustainable employment. Even marginal lands have found a vocation.

Third, cottage industry which was dying a slow death has received a new lease of life with demands for their produce and ancestral recipes finding a prominent place of display on the shelves. Fourth, contractors and subcontractors in various areas have found new hopes and opportunities. A new breed of entrepreneurs from the lower level has emerged!

Fifth, there has emerged a cut throat competition with continuous promotional campaigns on thousands of items of current use benefiting every consumer.

Does the political leadership want to change the socio-economic landscape of India towards a more egalitarian society or do they want to drive India back into deprivation and backwardness besides keeping the social divides intact? It is for the authorities to lay the terms and conditions as regards the priorities that the local produce should be given!

Go to South hall in London; see for yourself how the corner shops owned by Indians have managed to survive the onslaught of organized super and hypermarkets.

(About the Author: Atma Doolooa, a Mauritian of Indian origin, is a political analyst and businessman. He has authored books, Castes In Mauritius -The Future of Indians and Hinduism, & The Dirty Indian)

COMMENTS (6)
Guest
Name
Email Id
Verification Code
Sayantan Khamaru
Everybody is aware of the good things hypermarts will bring along with them. Few are aware of their negative effects. Yes, it increases demand but then it also puts a pressure on the farmers to produce a specific kind of food grain/vegetable under a specific guideline - the entire background of which is driven by the motive of profits. Remember the "Neel Revolution" in India during the rule of East India Company? That destroys the ecology, isnt it? What do you say about that Mr. Doolooa?
Manas Upadhyay
The example of Indian Shops in UK are very apt. Not to forget these shops survive even after recession and racism attacks on many. Shows clearly Indians as business personalities can fight it out anyday. FDI should not be seen as a hindrance.
Krishna Bhargava
I would like to ask the author if FDI has done great to Mauritius, will it also do the good in the same proportion for India??? Do you think FDI in multi brand retails has the uniform impact all over the world???
Sangram Majumdar
Mamata Bannerjee's example of taking the people of state backward is a little uncalled for, Mr. Doolooa. While I am not particularly a fan of Ms. Banerejee's antics, however when it comes to choosing between two evils (Left Front and Mamata) - Bengal had only one choice. The TATA Motors episode was highly politicized, wrongly promoted by media and truths manipulated. There were forces from other automobile majors who played a crucial role in making things happen the way it happened - cause Nano getting delayed served to the benefit of many. However, the point is hopefully you will not put an incident forward as an example only on the basis of its facevalue and will look deeper into the reasons behind it.
Sitaraman
Untill and unless FDI comes into India and it shows its impact for few years, one should not make his or her mind in favor or against the FDI...
Amit
Mr. Doolooa, we can agree with your views on FDI but why there are so many protests also world wide against WalMart?
Advertisement
merinews for RTI activists
In This Article
mamata banerjee
(522 Articles)

Create email alerts

Total subscribers: 205929
Advertisement
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.