| Last updated less than one minute ago
Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
Follow Us
  
Mumbai Attacks: The Afghanistan connection
Questions abound in the public regarding the slip-ups committed by our security agencies and culpability of our politicians in being unable to prevent it. But few have asked the question ��� why now? The answer may lead us to Afghanistan.
THE AUDACIOUS attack on India’s financial capital, which spilled the blood of hundreds, has left the entire nation shocked. It was no ordinary terror attack (if ever a terror attack can be termed as such). Only for the second time since the first Kalashnikov rounds were fired on the soil of India, did the spectra of heavily armed terrorists targeting high profile people in high profile buildings present itself before the eyes of those who faced it and the millions across India who spent anxious, nail-biting moments glued to their televisions sets. The first was the 2001 Parliament attack. Except for the troop mobilisation witnessed in the previous instance, the Indian reaction to the Mumbai attack is also in line with the one in the wake of Parliament attack.


Questions abound in the public regarding the slip-ups committed by our security agencies and culpability of our politicians in being unable to prevent it. But few have asked the question – why now? The answer may lead us to Afghanistan and its trouble-torn border with Pakistan.


Since the loss of strategic depth after the ouster of Taliban at the hands of the Northern Alliance and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) forces, Al-Qaeda and Taliban elements have shifted across the border. There is an ample body of evidence to point out that such elements are present in the tribal areas in western Pakistan bordering Afghanistan. With this came the immense pressure from USA and allies on Pakistan to act against these elements holed up in its western region. In response, Pakistan placed a sizable number of its troops in the region, but to no avail.


In recent times the growing impatience of USA has become evident in the rise in “unilateral military actions” taken by it in the region. If Pakistani troops are already present there, why was there a need for USA to take matters in its own hand? It is quite likely that USA herself does not trust Pakistan to handle the situation and even more likely, suspects certain elements in Pakistan to be either actively involved in or actively aiding terrorism (there is enough evidence in this regard too). Those same elements are, in all probability, involved in the Mumbai attack.


It is possible that the intention of the terror attack was to bring about a reaction similar to the one after the Parliament attack. Such a reaction would force the Pakistani troops from the western frontier to the border with India. Already, things are moving in that direction. This would give the much required breathing space to the terror elements in western Pakistan and an excuse plausible enough for the international community for not acting against terror elements present in Pakistan.
Commenting System
COMMENTS (1)
.It is definitely one possibility and the plot was comparable to the failed "Landmarks" plot foiled by US intelligence in 1993. The alQaeda hand is evident as far as the planning is concerned. With suspected HUJI links and Jaish and LeT links , it might be a combined attack planned and executed by forces hostile to India.
1 Replies
Speculation is rife . Why were the head investgators killed by the gunmen? What do the investigations reveal?
Individual User Corporate User ( For submitting Press Release and Jobs )
Email / Login ID
Password