Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
NaMo and BJP should not count the chickens before they hatch
Is there any Modi wave in the ongoing election campaign? Everyone will answer it differently as per his/her choice. BJP and Modi fans would say, yes there is a Modi wave, while some neutrals would there is an anti-UPA or anti-Congress wave. Some would say there is no wave. But let?s understand what this wave is all about.

Wave is always considered when a party wins everywhere or a party is defeated everywhere. Here, everywhere can be defined in the national context or in a regional context. For example, the last assembly election result showed Congress is decimated in four states. It can be considered as an anti-Congress wave. It?s not considered as BJP wave or Modi wave, because although the Congress is decimated in all four states but BJP couldn?t win Delhi assembly, where AAP got 28 seats and BJP got 4 seats less from forming the government.

Thus a wave can be identified only after counting of votes and not before that. Thus speculating a Modi wave or anti-Congress wave at this moment is always hypothetical and really untrue.

Let?s recall the 2004 general elections, where everyone was talking of Vajpayee wave. But the result was against the expectations. NDA defeated and UPA with post poll alliance formed the government. Even during 2009, many said there was an anti-UPA wave and Advani expected to ride on this anti-UPA wave to become the Prime Minister of India. He had also accepted the title of ?PM in waiting? and remained ?PM in waiting? still now as UPA formed government again in 2009 and BJP suffered further loss. Thus I would say with conviction that there is no wave at all for any party or against any party.

Now the next question will arise. Does Modi's presence have an impact for BJP in this general election? On this question, I would say with equal conviction that definitely Modi has a strong impact on BJP?s prospect. This impact generates no wave, rather generate strong under-current. The under-current can be defined as majority of the people are willing to vote in favour of Modi led BJP. But this willingness can?t be considered as a wave.

A wave can be possible if a party can harness the undercurrent to build a wave. Thus BJP needs to do all the ground work to harness this strong under-current. Popularity alone can?t win election. Elections are won or lost at polling booths. People supporting or liking Modi/BJP does not matter, if they do not come to polling booths to cast the vote.

During the 2004 elections also, there was a strong pro-Vajpayee under-current. He was the darling of middle class. But, he lost the election, because there was less voting by middle class. They didn?t come to polling booth expecting that NDA in any case would win. BJP ground worker and activists also became over-confident and considered the under-current as wave and didn?t attempt to harness the under-current. The current always became useless if it?s not harnessed properly.

Best example of this under-current and need of harnessing can be understood and realized if one closely scrutinizes Delhi Assembly elections. BJP?s Delhi-in-charge, Nitin Gadkari did a mistake of considering the pro-Modi under-current as Modi wave and remained complacent. It?s perhaps Modi?s strategists, who smelled a possible AAP win and BJP defeat during noon from the voting pattern. After which, damage control started on war basis and ground workers started mobilizing their supporters to polling booth. 20 seats went for voting till 8.30 pm and BJP won 12 out of these twenty seats with small margin. Had this damage control not been conducted in time, AAP would have bagged around 40 seats as there was a pro-AAP undercurrent too.

Thus BJP need to differentiate between under-current and wave. Under-current needs to be harnessed diligently to result a potential wave. The BJP supporters need to be brought to polling booths to cast their vote. Else despite strong Modi under-current, BJP would end up in the losing side and there could be a 3rd or 4th front with Congress being a part.

Also if this under-current is not harnessed properly and utilized wrongly, it would have a strong catastrophic effect. For example, after the 8th December 2013, AAP?s electoral success generated a strong under-current towards AAP and its convener Arvind Kejriwal.

People liked the party and Kejriwal sparked a new revolution. Even Modi was out of everyone?s mind for some days. Unfortunately AAP?s over-ambition reversed the under-current as if polarity changed. AAP should have harnessed this under-current carefully to consolidate their party slowly but strongly. But they indulged in hypes and drama and then suddenly go national. In this process they lost credibility. The under-current is going against them.

The conclusion is popularity creates under-current. The under-current needs to be harnessed to build a wave. If it?s not harnessed the under-current becomes useless. If the under-current is wrongly used, it damages self prospect. This is applicable for all parties, individuals and stake-holders contesting an election.

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.