Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
Nuke deal hurts India's national objective
There are numerous objections, the most fundamental being it is totally incompatible with India's nuclear supremacy over the United States which has to be India's national objective and its one-point agenda

  The objections to the nuclear deal can be arranged in a hierarchy:



The first and a fundamental objection is spending untold billions of dollars on imported reactors instead of ploughing the money into India's own nuclear power programme more advanced and more capable (thanks to its nuclear “isolation” and apartheid) than that of the United States in important ways. It can be expanded 10 or 20-fold so India becomes one of the world's biggest exporters, not an importer, of the world's best and most economical reactors with the shortest time for installation (all this is true of Indian reactors even at this moment). There is significant demand for Indian reactors from other countries. This by itself is enough reason to summarily and totally reject the nuclear deal. Indians, such as the head of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India, SK Jain say they will not export them unless they receive permission from the white master. In an act of 'treason', the National Security Adviser MK Narayanan has said that importing uranium from non-NSG countries -- the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is a cartel like OPEC -- will be against “international law”.
Similarly, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee during his recent visit to Egypt said that India cannot engage in nuclear trade with other countries because it is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. These statement have gone unchallenged in India’s media controlled by CIA-RAW. India can extract an unlimited amount of uranium from sea water for which the Japanese demonstrated the technology and economic viability decades ago and for which India’s Department of Atomic Energy has developed indigenous technology but the United States has been suppressing this option because it will subvert its attempts to bring and keep countries like India in slavery and Indian politicians and scientists, bought up by the United States, are keeping quiet about it.
  • The second objection is that the imported reactors will be light water reactors. These will not only make India dependent in perpetuity on imported fuel and vulnerable to all kinds of pressures but, even if an unlimited amount of fuel was somehow magically guaranteed, it will fatally injure both India's 3-stage nuclear power programme and its nuclear weapons program. This is so even if there was not an upper limit of 20 percent enrichment while reprocessing the waste fuel from the imported reactors. Light water reactors are inherently "proliferation-resistant" (that is, it is difficult to get bomb-grade material from them), though not "proliferation-proof". In any case, the 20 percent cap on enrichment (weapons and certain types of reactors require around 95 percent enrichment) cripples India's strategic (nuclear weapons) programme -- because parity with or supremacy over the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads -- and ensures permanent slavery to the white man and permanent serfdom to India.
    When the Russians offered the two light water reactors, now under construction in India at Kalpakkam, the Department of Atomic Energy had strongly opposed it correctly saying that it will only benefit the Russian nuclear industry and light water reactors will break India's control over the nuclear fuel cycle and subvert India's 3-stage nuclear power program as well as its nuclear weapons program. But Vajpayee shoved it down India's throat on the instructions of the C.I.A. which calculated that there will be less resistance to such a disadvantageous deal with the Russians and once a couple of light water reactors have been brought in, it will set the stage for a full-scale American assault to subjugate and disembowel India's nuclear program. A bought up Kakodkar is now lying and saying that importing Russian reactors was always in the plans. Press reports at the time of Manmohan Singh’s visit to Washington in July, 2004, during which he signed the joint statement of July 18, 2004 with Bush about the nuclear deal, etc., had said Kakodkar had strenuously objected to the deal but was silenced by the traitor ambassador of India in Washington by saying the Prime Minister had to have a “successful” visit. After he was bribed, Bush asked him, during his visit to New Delhi in March, 2006 if he was happy now.
  • Then there are the various requirements in the July 18 '05 joint statement such as separation of civilian and military reactors, IAEA inspections on the civilian reactors including all imported ones, the necessity to get Nuclear Suppliers Group approvals, etc. which cripple India's nuclear program as a whole and bind it hand and foot to the United States.
  • Then there is the blizzard of demands and restrictions in the Hyde Act and previous U.S. legislation including the prohibition of testing (the latest 'concession' by the U.S. on testing simply says that, rather than a test resulting in automatic return of all imported U.S. equipment, the U.S. president may ALLOW India to conduct a test at his pleasure if India begs and convinces the White Master) that make India a total slave to the United States which, even under the documents, will be able to do any damn thing it wants to India in all its internal and external affairs-- a serfdom that is comprehensive and complete.
  • Then there is the United States' propensity and certainty of doing things to India-- once it has India dependent on U.S. reactors, fuel, permissions, etc.-- to arm-twist, blackmail and invade if the lesser breeds don't do everything it wants them to do-- the kind of things it has done and is doing to Iraq and will certainly do to India, including its complete nuclear disarmament, participation in U.S.-led military campaigns against other countries, the total colonisation of its economy and manpower to serve American needs, etc.
    Indians on the C.I.A.'s payroll have been pushing this deal which should have been and was instantly and totally rejected, not just by me. The BJP/Vajpayee came out with a written statement rejecting the deal within a couple days of the joint statement of July 18 '05 (before the Hyde Act, the 123 agreement, etc.) but they have been yielding to the trangressions of Manmohan Singh progressively and now Advani says everything is fine so long as India can conduct nuclear tests in a Pokhran III! This is extremely stupid, to take the most charitable view of him.
  • Getting India's nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, whether or not India imports American reactors, has been a prime American goal because at least 75 percent of the damage to India's nuclear program would have been done once the facilities are placed under IAEA inspections, even if nothing further is done and no nuclear deal with the United States is finally signed and no foreign reactors, from the United States or from Russia or France, are bought. Any move to put Indian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards, beyond the ones under IAEA inspections at present, is a grave injury to the nation and an invasion of India like the American invasion of Iraq and deserves a response appropriate to an invasion. If the nuclear deal with the United States is abandoned but IAEA inspections are brought in on the pretext that they are needed to import reactors and fuel from Russia -- one prong of the American strategy and the Americans’ Indian collaborators has been to get the IAEA inspections in place without completing the nuclear deal with the United States and buy Russian reactors instead of American ones, to begin with -- the import of Russian reactors instead of pumping the money into the indigenous nuclear program will be an additional injury. I have said India's nuclear program should be designed and operated so that electricity is a byproduct of producing material for making weapons rather than material for making weapons being a byproduct of producing electricity. Manmohan Singh is still starving the Indian nuclear program of funds and still blocking the option of getting uranium from non-NSG countries, if necessary, though simply exploiting the uranium reserves in the country already known -- at present only 300 tonne per year is mined though the known reserves are over 78,000 tons not counting the extremely rich deposits recently found in Ladakh -- is quite enough for India's needs. It is a lie to say that India's nuclear power production cannot be expanded beyond 10,000 MW on domestic uranium, though the production of electricity must be a byproduct of producing material for making weapons.


    A country that has ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States cannot be restricted from importing, without IAEA inspections, etc., however much uranium it wants from wherever it wants by the United States or any other power; the power of nuclear weapons is what India needs; electricity can be produced in numerous other ways for the time being.
    Agreeing to even talks on new inspections with the IAEA -- an instrument of American imperialism -- are acts of treason and deserve punishment as severe as for the rest of the nuclear deal.
    Nuclear supremacy over the United States has to be India’s national objective and its one point agenda (see my article ‘What is nuclear Supremacy?’ on Merinews). The nuclear deal is totally incompatible with nuclear supremacy over the United States and deserves to be summarily rejected without going into any details. This is the most fundamental objection of all.
    COMMENTS (19)
    Guest
    Name
    Email Id
    Verification Code
    Email me on reply to my comment
    Email me when other CJs comment on this article
    }
    Sign in to set your preference
    Advertisement
    merinews for RTI activists
    In This Article
    manmohan singh
    (2071 Articles)
    pranab mukherjee
    (584 Articles)


    Advertisement
    Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.