Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
Relativism and the Kashmir dispute
In order to understand the complexity of Kashmir dispute the proper understanding of Hindu-Muslim relations is a must. Many Muslims complain that Hindus as a group do not understand Islam and Muslims as a group and also that Hindu-dominated India wants to subjugate the Muslim-dominated state of J&K. Also, that Indians are hegemonic in nature because of their size-superiority vis-à-vis Pakistan.

The equally true is the fact that Muslims also do not understand Hinduism and Hindus. Let us analyze the belief of Muslims that Qur’an can solve all the problems of humanity. Qur’an does not recognize idol-worship as a valid way to worship God. So what solution would Qur’an offer to Hindus if they look at it?

Many can say that idol-worship was not the preferred way to pray the Ishvara during the Vedic period. Well, the answer to this question is sacrifice offered during the worship and Brahmins invoking deities during rituals are more or less related with idol-worship. Moreover, the true meaning of Sanatana Dharma implies that Hindus have to worship idol. Also, the important thing is how the religion is practiced by its followers and not merely what is written in sacred scriptures. Nowadays, almost all Hindus worship an idol. It cannot relegate them to be atheists or non-believers.  

An impatient reader can ask what it has to do with the Kashmir dispute? Everything and nothing! It depends who you are. For leaders it matters most because their opinions matter not only to them but to their followers as well. If Valley Muslims continue to be affected by ‘categorical perception’ then they would always see India as a ‘ghost’ and an ‘aggressor’. It is permanent fixation; more the time passes, more it becomes non-elastic permanently.

If one starts with prejudices and biases then a problem becomes more complicated. Kashmir dispute has a religion-angle as Pakistan was created because of Iqbal and Jinnah’s assertion that Hindus and Muslims are separate nationalities and they should have separate nations whenever and wherever possible. The creation of Pakistan is good for the overall stability of the region but the division of Kashmir stabilizes the region as well.

The simple argument that Kashmir is a Muslim-majority state and therefore, it should either merge with Pakistan or become independent is incorrect. What Valley Muslims think is that since they have co-religionists in India, in the South Asia and globe all over and therefore, not only their campaign is justified but it is also sustainable and viable. This is not a wrong thinking in this identity-driven high consciousness era.

Now Indian stand is inconsistent is well known as it allowed referendum in Hyderabad and Junagadh but denied the same to Kashmir. Of course, Pakistan would not have fulfilled the condition of vacating its occupied land as demanded by UNSC if referendum were to hold. Anyway, there was no Taliban and al-Qaeda in Pakistan then, but the West still didn’t favor it. Why? The reasons were that the West found division of Kashmir between India and Pakistan as more stabilizing and also it allowing it to play the now famous ‘zero sum game’ in the subcontinent. Indian stakes in Kashmir keep the temperature down in the region. This was the utter selfishness of the West and it looking at the region over very long term that shaped its policies on Kashmir. The West had nothing to do with either of the dominant religions of the region.

But Kashmir dispute mostly invokes hostile religious feeling in the subcontinent both ways, whereas in reality it is purely a geo-political dispute. The reason for religious hostility has to do with the fact that people emphasize their religions’ absoluteness more than they understand that of others. This is becoming truer and more frequent in this online social networking dominated era.

Relativism is the single biggest clue in resolving the Kashmir dispute: Hinduism has the same meaning for Hindus as Islam has for Muslims. Similarly, as Indians love India, Pakistanis also love their nation. As far as Valley Muslims are concerned they may have genuine problems against Indian administration and that needs to be frankly admitted and corrected by Indian authorities. But the ghost of religion needs to be exorcized.

Therefore, the problem is not rooted in religious beliefs, instead in the selfishness of the parties concerned and in the stability of the region. Fine, Valley Muslims may not agree but Indian stakes in Kashmir are gainful to many and can lead to win-win situation for all. If Valley does not recognize this simple fact and also the fact that nuclear complexity of the region has made exclusive solutions virtually impossible, then it cannot have clues about their legitimate demands that India and international community can consider. The people need to be realistic and objective in their assessments.

Valley can reintegrate fully with its brethrens in Pakistani administered Kashmir and with those in Pakistan, culturally, economically and socially. Only thing they cannot get is a sovereign status like India and Pakistan. Valley Muslims need to understand that their permanent dominance as a group is assured by special status of Kashmir in Indian Constitution. The constituencies are so demarcated as to favor Muslims. Similarly, Jammu and Ladakh cannot get separate statehood without the consent of J&K Assembly which will always be dominated by the Valley.

Why I have just talked about Valley is that because of the relativism, localism, nationalism and continuity, Jammu and Ladakh have become undisputed parts of India just like Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas in Pakistan have become unalienable parts of Pakistan. Only Valley is disputed from investors’ viewpoint. One needs to understand that reconciliation is possible after relativism is accepted while unnecessary emphasis on absoluteness would lead to continued confrontation.

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of merinews.com. In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
COMMENTS (11)
Guest
Name
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
}
Sign in to set your preference
The article is not clear as to what writer wants to convey. My views are that the Kashmir issue has been raised by Pakistan as a result of the Partition of the country in 1947. The Partition which had as its basis the two nation theory and left millions dead and many more millions homeless, should not have been agreed to because the two nation theory had no validity. If Muslims were a separate Nation, then all the Muslims of the world would have been living in one nation only but there are several nations of the Muslim viz Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc. The Muslims of these nations call them Indonesians, Iranians, Iraqis and Saudi Arabians. The dismemberment of erstwhile Pakistan into Pakistan and Bangladesh also nullifies the theory of two Nations. However, what has been done cannot now be undone and all the three nations which constituted the pre-partition India viz India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have to co-exist peacefully. However, Pakistan has made Kashmir the bone of contention for the reason that Kashmir has predominantly Muslim population, forgetting the fact that India is a secular country and States like Kashmir, Punjab and Nagaland etc. which have mainly Muslim, Sikh and Christian population are its essential parts and represent a unique feature of Indian secularism wherein even the national minorities form majority within the respective State. The Maharaja of Kashmir as per the terms of the policy laid down by the then British rulers for granting Independence to India, had acceded to India and therefore, Kashmir is an integral part of India. Also Kashmir, Punjab, Nagaland, Meghalaya etc. underline and strengthen our secular fabric. So, there is no question of any negotiations in so far as Kashmir is concerned because if we negotiate regarding Kashmir, it would open for us a whole Pandora of negotiations in respect of other States having major population of national minorities. Hence, we must tell Pakistan and these Hurriyat leaders in no uncertain terms that Kashmir is our integral part and is not negotiable. However, we cannot attack a nuclear Pakistan for recovering the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and Line of Control which is de facto border between India and Pakistan, may be deemed to be a permanent border between the two countries. Let status quo be maintained.
The article is not clear as to what writer wants to convey. My views are that the Kashmir issue has been raised by Pakistan as a result of the Partition of the country in 1947. The Partition which had as its basis the two nation theory and left millions dead and many more millions homeless, should not have been agreed to because the two nation theory had no validity. If Muslims were a separate Nation, then all the Muslims of the world would have been living in one nation only but there are several nations of the Muslim viz Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia etc. The Muslims of these nations call them Indonesians, Iranians, Iraqis and Saudi Arabians. The dismemberment of erstwhile Pakistan into Pakistan and Bangladesh also nullifies the theory of two Nations. However, what has been done cannot now be undone and all the three nations which constituted the pre-partition India viz India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have to co-exist peacefully. However, Pakistan has made Kashmir the bone of contention for the reason that Kashmir has predominantly Muslim population, forgetting the fact that India is a secular country and States like Kashmir, Punjab and Nagaland etc. which have mainly Muslim, Sikh and Christian population are its essential parts and represent a unique feature of Indian secularism wherein even the national minorities form majority within the respective State. The Maharaja of Kashmir as per the terms of the policy laid down by the then British rulers for granting Independence to India, had acceded to India and therefore, Kashmir is an integral part of India. Also Kashmir, Punjab, Nagaland, Meghalaya etc. underline and strengthen our secular fabric. So, there is no question of any negotiations in so far as Kashmir is concerned because if we negotiate regarding Kashmir, it would open for us a whole Pandora of negotiations in respect of other States having major population of national minorities. Hence, we must tell Pakistan and these Hurriyat leaders in no uncertain terms that Kashmir is our integral part and is not negotiable. However, we cannot attack a nuclear Pakistan for recovering the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and Line of Control which is de facto border between India and Pakistan, may be deemed to be a permanent border between the two countries. Let status quo be maintained.
Advertisement

Interesting content

merinews for RTI activists

Create email alerts

Total subscribers: 208439
Advertisement
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.