Welcome Guest, Login   
 Home |  World | India | Sports | Business | Technology | Entertainment | Lifestyle | Potpourri | Reviews | Press Releases | Interviews | Citizen Journalism
Home > India > Article
Shameful religious extremism
Religious extremism has risen sharply in the society. In the name of God, a few extremists hurt our religious sentiments and emotions. If religion cannot lead to peaceful co-existence, then I feel there is no need for temples, mosques or churches.
 
Thu, Sep 18, 2008 12:57:04 IST
Views:
927
   Comments:
3
Rate:  1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5 4 out of 5 5 out of 5 5.0 / 2 votes
FOR SOME time now, I have been pondering over some trends that are threatening Indian society. These trends are so very hazardous that if not taken care of, they have potential to completely destroy the secular and democratic fabric of the nation. This disturbing trend is religious extremism. The so called custodians of the faith have chosen the path of extremism and is applicable to all religions in India be it Hindus, Muslims or Christians. A study conducted by United Nation revealed, “There is a significant rise in religious extremism and intolerance throughout the world, no religion is free from religious extremism.” Religion doesn’t mean harm, but it inflicts damage on us if it blinds us to extremism.

Everyone wants to show the greatness of one’s religion over the other and to ensure this, they can go to any extent. Bajrang Dal, Islamist Fundamentalists or Christian extremists speak on our behalf for hurting our religious sentiments. I just wonder who gave them onus to do so? Every day the media flashes such news of few people advocating moral cleansing, thrashing people if they do not confirm to their norms and they are doing so to protect their religion or culture. Be it Valentine’s Day or attacking any inter-caste or inter- religion marriage, their critics, on every such occasion, give bruises to our emotions. Extremism, religious or in the form of suppression of citizen rights, is nothing but an exercise of brute force. Fundamentalists do not believe in individualism, liberty of personal choice or plurality of thought.

I think that prime reason behind all this is that some groups are not comfortable with growing internal diversity and the fear of loosing their identity in the process. The people of this country can also very easily be incited. If anybody wants to create a problem, they just have to insult an iconic figure or plant a bomb or deliver speech and you see the results. It is remarkable that India has evolved into a mature democracy after just 60 years. Not just a mature democracy but a vibrant, fast-growing economy. We expect India to be shiny and secular and scientific, focused on technological breakthroughs and making money. We don’t expect religious riots, communal clashes and bombings in every nook and corner of the country, which is unfortunately happening every other day. These things do post a challenge to our democratic set up.

The fundamentalists cannot be countered without a relentless and uncompromising fight. The struggle should be both theoretical and tactical. Democracy and secularism should be applied in practice and not remain a mere play of words. As responsible citizens of the country, we should refrain from indulging in anything that disintegrates the society. If religion cannot lead to peaceful co-existence, then I feel there is no need for temples, mosques or churches; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.

Let me finish with a poem of Rabindranath Tagore:

’Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high, Where knowledge is free,
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls,
Where words come out from depth of truth
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;
Where the mind is led forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action
Into that heaven of freedom, my father, Let my country awake!’
 E-mail | Print | Post comment
 
Post your comment
Post
Posted comments (3)
 
This article is really thought provoking. Bbut whetherl everyone will rise above petty considerations and view things from the wriiter's perspective is to be seen to be believed. I wonder why no votes have been cast!
 
 
|
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
 
This article is another "secular" rant without a clear understanding of ground realities and geopolitical risks. I think this kind of rhetoric suits politically correct sounding politicians who can not speak up for the loss of their own identity in their own country. The issue is much more deep rooted than what is apparent. The modern day warfare is multifaceted and demographic profiles of countries are changed through migration and religious conversion. The author is talking about ethnic cleansing- it is one of the most common forms of human rights violation and the so called secular states of the world have practiced it in subtle forms in their own backyards. Religion and politics can never ever be separated and history of human civilisation has ample examples of the same. Before the author talks of Hindu fundamentalism let him understand that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life. Hindiusm does not decry any form of belief system and its principles are universal. Hinduism has borne the brunt of other religious onslaughts and has remained intact. Hindus do not issue fatwas and Hinduism preachers and practitioners have not told Pope or any other government what they should do to protect the rights of Hindus in other countries. I do not support violence and wars but the modern day sovereign state threats are not from external invaders but the so called protectors of "secularism" who feel Bajrang Dal needs to be banned because SIMI is banned. So the logic is if you have to ban SIMI, ban one Hindu organization also to prove your secular credentials. These intellectual coward secularists are the real danger to this great diverse country and not the minorities and Hindus.
 
 
|
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
 
This article is another "secular" rant without a clear understanding of ground realities and geopolitical risks. I think this kind of rhetoric suits politically correct sounding politicians who can not speak up for the loss of their own identity in their own country. The issue is much more deep rooted than what is apparent. The modern day warfare is multifaceted and demographic profiles of countries are changed through migration and religious conversion. The author is talking about ethnic cleansing- it is one of the most common forms of human rights violation and the so called secular states of the world have practiced it in subtle forms in their own backyards. Religion and politics can never ever be separated and history of human civilisation has ample examples of the same. Before the author talks of Hindu fundamentalism let him understand that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life. Hindiusm does not decry any form of belief system and its principles are universal. Hinduism has borne the brunt of other religious onslaughts and has remained intact. Hindus do not issue fatwas and Hinduism preachers and practitioners have not told Pope or any other government what they should do to protect the rights of Hindus in other countries. I do not support violence and wars but the modern day sovereign state threats are not from external invaders but the so called protectors of "secularism" who feel Bajrang Dal needs to be banned because SIMI is banned. So the logic is if you have to ban SIMI, ban one Hindu organization also to prove your secular credentials. These intellectual coward secularists are the real danger to this great diverse country and not the minorities and Hindus.
 
 
|
Reply to Comment | New Comment | Report Abuse
 
 
Loading
Latest in India