In the recently concluded Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, he was the star campaigner of his party, Congress. During election time he worked almost for 24x7, visited every part of the state, addressed hundreds of rallies, rubbed shoulders of poor, elderly, verbally attacked other parties and promised better governance, a crime-free state and development. But what happened? His party failed to perform under his banner. However, some Congress leaders showed their loyalty towards Rahul Gandhi and took blame on themselves. But Rahul can't escape from his failure in the state.

If I talk about "communal" Narendra Modi, I never find him as communal. The media, the so-called secular leaders of the country, have been blaming Narendra Modi since the last 10 years continuously, but forgot to describe his work in the state. He says, I do for Gujaratis, never say I do for such or such religion. Development can be seen in every part of Gujarat. In his state all the infrastructure is growing rapidly. Many big names in Indian and world industry have invested in the state. I think no one can blame Narendra Modi that he has not done enough for the development of his state Gujarat.

If Narendra Modi is communal than how is that he won assembly elections in the state with a huge margin. In 2007 assembly elections, BJP won 117 seats in a 182-member assembly. In the 2004 Parliamentary elections, BJP won 14 seats, whereas in 2009 general elections, BJP won 15 seats. No one can blame himi for any unfair means in elections in the state because Election Commission of India do their work with honesty and always keep an eye on each polling booth. It is not possible to win with a huge margin without the support of the minorities in a state. Many Muslims support Narendra Modi for his development work.

I read an article that Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar said NDA must select its candidate for PM. Nitish Kumar's party JD(U) is one of the most important allies of NDA. Nitish Kumar also said without naming Narendra Modi, that Modi will not be acceptable by NDA. But, time has now come that BJP should re-think and propose the name of Narendra Modi as the next Prime Ministerial candidate from NDA instead of opposing it. He should get chance based on this track record for development in his state.

If Indian voters cast their important vote in the name of Narendra Modi then there would not be any doubt to elect him as the Prime Minister otherwise he is already isolated by the Indian secular leaders. If Indian voters have no issues with Narendra Modi, then why our so-called secular leaders are opposing Modi? In that case either voters will be assumed communal or should we understand that voters are not aware of Narendra Modi's image as portrayed by the media and politicians?