Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
  
The once profit-making BSNL is on a comeback trail
Untill 1984 the Indian telecom sector was entirely under government control, and the private sector was having access to only telecommunication equipment manufacturing. In early nineties the industry was liberalised and private participation poured in almost all of its segments. At the inception of mobile operations in India, BSNL lead from the front - but the once-popular telcom operator hit a stumbling block due to stiff competition from private players. After running up losses in the last three years, the PSU is trying to stabilize its position in the market.

MOBILE SERVICES in India started way back in 1995 on non-commercial basis. Essar launched the first mobile in India, and the first mobile operation was provided by MODI Telstra. Sluggish growth thereafter due to unfriendly telecom policies added only 1 million users till 1998. But then came new regulations in 1999. The number of mobile phones crossed five million by 2001 and doubled to 10 million in 2002.

Advertisement
In 2000 the government established Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL). The state-run telecom company BSNL started mobile services in 2002. When BSNL started its mobile services the subscribers latched on to BSNL on a huge scale seeing the coverage area the cost effective tariff plans in comparison to other private players. At that time owning a BSNL SIM was a matter of status symbol among the mobile users in the wake of its inadequate availablity. To get a BSNL SIM, a booking in advance was mandatory. Such was the popularity and demand that people started selling BSNL SIM cards in the black market and there were hundreds of takers.

However, with passing time and the entry of more private players, competition increased in the telecom market. Further, the government liberalized the FDI policies for the telecom industry by raising the bar of foreign investment from 49% to 74% in 2004-2005, which resulted in an influx of foreign companies into the Indian telecom market. Entry of foreign players in the market led to capacity creation, and better infrastructure, which in turn improved the network quality.

During the time of introduction of cellular phones, the outgoing call rates were to the tune of Rs. 16 per minute and incoming calls were also heavily charged. However, the competition also resulted in a sharp reduction of telecom tariff.

Analysts believe that BSNL, which once enjoyed supremacy, failed to compete with the private operators, and with every financial year, its losses went on adding up. Today, the state-run telecom company is known to be a sick PSU - with BSNL posing losses in the last three fiscal years now. With a subscriber base of 97.7 million, it trails Bharti, Vodafone, Reliance Communications, Idea Cellular and Tata Teleservices.

It is expected that BSNL may suffer a loss of around Rs 7,000 crore in fiscal year 2011-12. During the year 2010-11, the company's net loss stood at Rs 5,997 crore.

But BSNL is trying to turn things around. BSNL subscribers often complain about the poor network and unsatisfactory services, however, the minister of state for communications and IT Milind Deora, on the first day of the monsoon session said in the Lok Sabha, claimed that the government-run compnay is not losing subscribers to private service providers. Furthermore, it's not just BSNL subscribers face issues of calls dropping, call disconnection, and weak signals. There are many areas and regions in the country where private operators have the license to operate but their signals are weak or even non-existant.

Deora also assured parliamentarians that BSNL is meeting the Quality of Service (QoS) benchmarks prescribed by the telecom regulator TRAI.

In an effort to increase its revenue, BSNL is getting into agreements with private players for sharing its over 70,000-strong tower infrastructure. As per media reports, the company is close to reaching a pact with Reliance Industries (RIL) subsidiary Infotel Broadband to improve services. In general, things are looking up for BSNL.

COMMENTS (8)
Guest
Name
Email Id
Verification Code
RITESH
BSNL WILL BE IN HUGE PROFIT IN THE COMING YEARS.
prasad
yes, bsnl was going in losses due to old unskilled persons, who r absorbed in bsnl in 2000. the old employes did not know abt the latest technologies. now the telecom sector was full of new technologies. and the new employes was less in number(10:1) in bsnl when compared to old employees.my best advice to bsnl is 1. vrs to old employes in step by step manner. 2. line mans should reside near by exchange, there fore 90% faults will be rectified, they should not do up and down to their jobs. 3. complaints and advices should be collected from public every time round the clock,like customer care. 4. marketing have to increase so much,other operators rc or tu are available any where, even in villages also but bsnl can't.
sm ramesh
Dear shiv, u never told that because of BSNL entry in the mobile sector, mobile tariff came down to Rs.2 for out going calls and Rs.0 for incoming calls. Also if BSNL is not there, then u can expect a cartel of mobile operartors and ministers and they will steal all ur money and public will be cheated. Better if ur articles are un-biased and full.
USHA
,BSNL is being run by top class fools and idiots.there is nothing called as proffessional set up in the company.it is still managed like sarkari DOT.ITS ABSORBED AND NON ABSORBED BEGGERS ..........................USELESS DONKEYS......................
tanttu
Dear shiv mr shiv prakash,BSNL is being run by top class fools and idiots.there is nothing called as proffessional set up in the company.it is still managed like sarkari DOT.
Partha
Problem of BSNL is that land line business is very expensive and highly manpower oriented. So, even though, in urban areas, land line business is not loss making but due to low use and high cost involve, BSNL is facing loss in rural areas but it can not withdraw service either as there is no private land line operator in rural area or even urban areas . What is given in the neme of landline by private operators are basically WLL system which too is actually a mobile service and Supreme Court too refused to admit this system as land line. It is true that BSNL mobile signals nowadays has greatly improved and it can claim now at par with private operators except very few areas but unlike private operators, it never steals money . I have experienced that suddenly my money in pre paid mobile of private operators has been evaporated and when challenged got only unsatisfactory reply. BSNL broad band in land line is really excellent now. Let BSNL to improve little bit it's service so that, whenever any one calls help, BSNL personal immediately attends. If they improve in this service , I am sure, many like me will desert private operators.
koteswararao.nerella
It is not unknown to everybody in this country that successive MOCs prior to Mr.Sibal were the persons responsible for damaging the BSNL by patronising the private operators for their own selfish ends.There were several occsions in the recent past that the demand was so high but the BSNL has no capacity to provide the new lines due to one MOC cancelling tenders when they were in the final stage of approva.If the Govt. allows a free hand the company would have achieved NAVARATNA STATUS by this time.It is good Mr.Deora is sincere in admitting that the BSNL services are good and the company is slowly coming to good financial position.Let us hope the BSNL WILL AGAIN GAIN BACK ITS POSITION.
Hawkeye
Dear Shiv Prakash do you know who i responsible for the condition BSNL finds itself in?
Advertisement
merinews for RTI activists
In This Article

Create email alerts

Total subscribers: 205921
Advertisement
Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.