Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
The Supreme Court puts Ayodhya land dispute case on fast track
The Supreme Court of India in its judgment on 26th September 2018 has made its intention clear that it wants a speedy judgement of the Janmsthan case. The case has been dragging on since 1949 in one court or the other and it has made the legal process a butt of joke.

No more of that despite frivolous efforts of some politically motivated lawyers to put the case in cold storage. The Supreme Court smelt a fish therein and made a decision rejecting their plea to refer the case to a larger bench. Indeed acceding to the plea of Congress motivated senior advocates to refer the case to a larger bench as that would have meant another prolonged adjournment delaying disposal of the Ayodhya Janmsthan case.

The Supreme Court has directed the case for hearing and disposal on 29th

The three judge bench comprised Chief Justice of India, Justice Mishra, Justice Bhushan and Justice Nazeer, in a majority judgement 2:1, declined to revisit the 1994 judgment of Justice Farooqi that declared that a mosque was not an integral part of Islam for offering Namaz or prayers.The Supreme Court in its landmark judgement said that the piece of land 2.77 acres where RamLala is Virajman is a property dispute case and no other angle be looked into at present. The Supreme Court asked all parties to cooperate in prompt disposal of the long pending legal dispute to set the society at rest.

With a view to updating new citizens about facts and law of the case, it may be said that in 1528, the army of Babar had demolished the Ram Janmsthan temple and used the building material to construct a mosque at the site. The archaeological findings confirm that the Babri Masjid was built on the demolished temple site. According to Islamic scholars such a masjid is Haram and should not be used by Muslims for prayers. The historians confirm that the said mosque was not used for offering Islamic prayers. Moreover, it was in a dilapidated state when, as per Muslim guards posted there, there was a flash of heavenly light and a Muri of Ramlala appeared there. Since then Ramlala is Virajman there and a legal case on the disputed property has been going on since then.

A Mahant of Ayodhya is of the opinion that since the land in question did not belong to Babar, how could he build a mosque there, legally speaking. Moreover, as a foreign invader he has no locus standi in the case. Legal luminaries are of the opinion that since 1949 the mosque is in possession of the Hindu entities, Muslims forfeit right to possess it again as the law of Adverse Possession forbids them from doing so. In any case, why lend credence to a foreign invader and deprive millions of native Hindus from possessing and worshipping at the birth place of Maryada Purshottam Shri Ram. Some ignorant people, including the Congress party, has mistakenly denied birth and existence of Shri Ram. Shiv bhakt Rahul Gandhi di not contradict that anti-Hindu school of thought that his mother, Sonia Gandhi had supported. What a shame, Rahul Gandhi and his clan?

The Supreme Court subscribed to the view that saying Islamic prayer only in a mosque is not an integral part of Islam.

It is hoped that soon the Supreme Court will deliver its final judgement and order restoring the Janmsthan where Ram Lalla is presently virajman, to the Hindus of Bharat.

Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.