Submit :
News                      Photos                     Just In                     Debate Topic                     Latest News                    Articles                    Local News                    Blog Posts                     Pictures                    Reviews                    Recipes                    
The two realities - dual and non-dual
When the object and subject have merged together, what remains to be perceived? The knower and the known have become one in this state. 'Yatra tv asya sarvam atmaivabhut'- where only atman pervades everything, there is no creature and no creation.

ONE OF the most discussed and debated questions throughout known history has been related to the existence of man, world and God. Many theories have been put forward throughout the world, ranging from denial of God to the denial of Man. The former accept only the physical reality of the universe and the latter condemn those who question the reality of God. In the scriptures of Hindu religion, one finds not only an acceptance of existence of the God and man but also an exposition equating the both.

Hindu philosophies explain that to understand cosmos, it is very important to first understand the frame of reference from which the cosmos is being perceived. The scriptures speak about two different frames of references to understand the relationship between the man, the world and the God. They are the Vyavaharika state and the Paramarthika state.

The Vyavaharika state refers to the dual (Dwaita) state of reference. Most people understand the universe from this aspect. They perceive the duality of object and the subject. There is the world (Jagat) and there is individual (Jiva) and the God (Ishwara) all separate. The Paramarthika state refers to the absolute non-dual (Advaita) state of reference, where only Brahman/ Atman is. There is no difference between God or individual or the world. The former is a temporary and relative state of existence whereas the latter is the absolute-permanent state of existence.

Sage Yajnavalkya while discussing with his wife Maitreyi about the nature of this cosmos says, “(1) - yatra hi dvaitam iva bhavati, tad itara itara? jighrati, tad itara itaram pa?yati, tad itara itaram ?r?oti, tad itara itaram abhivadati, tad itara itaram manute, tad itara itara? vij?n?ti. yatra tv asya sarvam ?tm?iv?bh?t, tat kena ka? jighret, tat kena kam pa?yet, tat kena ka? ???uyat, tat kena kam abhivadet, tat kena kam manv?ta, tat kena ka? vij?n?y?t?”

It means “Where the duality is present, there one can smell the fragrance, one can speak to others, one can listen to others, one will pay respect to others, and one can think and understand. But, where there is only Atman everywhere, what will he smell? Whom will he ask? What will he listen to? Whom will he pay respect to? What will he think about and understand?”

The first part of the address refers to the Vyavaharika state. Here, the God, man and the world are separate things. God is the creator of the world. The individual Jiva is the worshipper and the God is the worshipped. The man is the subject and the world is the object. Hence, the man experiences the sensory objects. He can see, hear, taste, smell and feel the touch. He is subject to both the pains and pleasures of the sensory world.

The second part of the Yajnavalkya’s address beautifully captures the essence of Paramartika state. In the absolute state of non-duality, no question of a second arises. When the object and subject have merged together, what remains to be perceived? The knower and the known have become one in this state. “Yatra tv asya sarvam atmaivabhut”- where only atman pervades everything, there is no creature and no creation.

The same Brhad Aranyaka Upanishad says in another place, “Neha nanasti kinchana (2) - there exists nothing else anywhere (other than Brahman)”. In this state there is neither Dukha (pains) nor Sukha (pleasures), only Anand (bliss) exists. But only a theoretical understanding of this concept of two realities will lead to blind faith and false ego.

When people read the statement, “Brahmo Satyam, Jagat Mithyam, Jivo Brahmaiva Na Paraha”, many misunderstand it. They wonder, how can the God which is not visible is real/ truth and the world which is visible is unreal/ falsehood? Further, they question how can an individual be same as God? Many people feel the equating of man with God another way of denying the existence of God. But, these assumptions are far from truth. When it is said, “Brahmo Satyam”, The Satyam here refers to the eternal nature of existence of Brahman. Brahman being without beginning and hence without an end is eternal. This is the absolute truth (Satyam). On the other hand, the physical universe is in a continuous movement, where names and forms arise and die out. Hence, this world is not eternal truth i.e Mithyam.

Mithyam does not mean falsehood or non-existence; it simply means “temporary in nature”.  Further, the equation of Jiva (individual) and Brahman (God) mentioned in “Jivo Bramaiva Na paraha” is only from the Paramarthika frame of reference. In the world of dualities, man and God are indeed different even though in essence they are same. In the absolute state, no duality of God and man arises; the whole existence is one, which we may call as Atmam or Brahman. But most people cannot realize the Paramarthika Satya beyond logical and rational speculations.

For proper understanding of Shastras, a seeker of Paramarthika Satya must develop qualities like Viveka, Vairagya, Indriya Nigraha, Titiksha and Shradha (3) etc. It is these qualities that take a person towards Satya-Sakshatkara and hence towards Moksha. The shastras say, “Brahmvit Brahmeva Bhavati(4)”- The Knower of Brahman, verily becomes Brahman. All the sadhanas, the rituals like japa, homa and puja are all aimed at purifying the mind (chitta Shuddhi) of a sadhaka by which he can develop the above mentioned qualities. These qualities in-turn will enable a person to have Atma-sakshatkara (Self-realization) and hence Moksha (final Liberation).

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of In case you have a opposing view, please click here to share the same in the comments section.
Email Id
Verification Code
Email me on reply to my comment
Email me when other CJs comment on this article
Sign in to set your preference
merinews for RTI activists

Not finding what you are looking for? Search here.