Need of the Hour
SATISH SINGH | 09 Mar 2009

India is facing high degree of corruption. At this point change in the governance as well as the anti-terrorism module is the need of the hour.

There have been various incidents related to the Indian Judiciary as well as the Governance in which corruption is involved. There is a lot of outrage in the mind of the angry Indian. A lot needs to be done and changed. An aspect of this change is the Governance and the anti-corruption front.
According to a very popular saying, “Justice delayed is justice denied”. Nowadays this is the USP of Indian judiciary system. Corruption is very much a part of this USP. Besides this, other type of corruption is also persisting in the Indian temple of justice. Perhaps due to this hard fact, the Supreme Court has reminded all the lower courts that they cannot pass an order in a case without giving sufficient explanations and presence of evidence. Due to cases of some judges conveying judgments with no ample interpretation or reserving the hearing to one more date a bench comprising justice C.K Thakker and D.K Jain asked judges not to act in alacrity while passing their ultimate commands. Numerous questions may perhaps take place and it will be complicated for the parties as well as the higher court to come to a decision. This court, consequently denounces the articulating of concluding order and not including recording of reasons as a back up of such orders. The court observations point out somewhat towards the putting off and the laid back attitude, which is going on in Indian judiciary.
There are various organizations who work as a watchdog for corruption. “Global Integrity” is an independent watchdog organization which measures the level of governance and corruption in all countries. Basically, it gazes at corruption level of the world and on the foundation of anti corruption procedures; it comes to a decision of the ranks of every nation in the level of corruption and anti-corruption. Governance also comes under its purview, because on the basis of affirmative and unconstructive aspects of governance, this organization decides the ranking of countries.
This organization has recently released its report on the issue of governance and anti-corruption standards. Let us have a look at the figures quoted in the report-:

How fare are countries?

Legal Framework
Practical Implementation
Implementation Gap
Overall Rank
United States
Now shouldn’t we debate over the base? As per “Global Integrity” set of laws, accountability mechanism, media and public information are the source on which it decides the ranking of countries.
India’s anti-corruption laws achieve a pounding 100 on 100 but its citizens can not carry themselves to convicting the method and there is an excellent explanation for the “omnipresent glumness” about dishonesty, as, in India anti-corruption legislation is outstanding but law enforcement is pathetic. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India also get affirmation for “being autonomous and well-staffed” but report of this origination crushes the claim of CAG.
Free press is still not operational at this juncture. Many newspaper and electronic media are functioning either for business tycoons or political parties. Interestingly, both may be same.
Above and beyond this, daring journalists are also not free from fear. Honest journalists are often assaulted by hooligans, Police and administrative officials.
Elections are characteristically invested with the whole weigh down of democratic system, but since the report points out, high-quality ascendancy pivots on a lot of additional structural features. Exclusive of vocation, responsibility and precision apparatus, the structure can chip away at itself.
A liberated media, an affluent common civilization, intuitional checks and steadiness and in-house observing of dishonesty are also decisive to a well – governed nation.
India’s “reasonable” 11th rank among 55 is an amalgamation of full-bodied institutions and lack of answerability in key areas.
Judicial accountability is also feeble in India. Other predicament areas are bureaucratic preferential treatment and off-the books political financing.
Well, in this connection China and Pakistan have miserable accounts. China which completed 48th has gloomy splice evidence and Pakistan has all too many laws with negligible enforcement. The lack of recognized connection between elections and government receptiveness proposes that it may be more meaningful for crisis-ridden motherlands to spotlight on slow but sure institutional and legal enhancement as a replacement for simply fixating on how elections are held.
Even if the United States and Bulgaria scored the most outstanding states neither made the top evaluation of “extremely brawny”. Sixty per cent of the countries studied received overall rating of “feeble” or “extremely feeble”. Latvia, Spain, Japan, Italy, Romania, Canada, Costa Rica and France are also at the forefront of India, while Lebanon accomplished very last.