2017  
  2016  
  2015  
  2014  
  2013  
  2012  
  2011  
  2010  
  2009  
  2008  
  2007  
  2006  
Weak Anti-corruption measures in India
SATISH SINGH | 15 Dec 2008

There is a very popular maxim, “Justice Delays, justice denied”. Nowadays this is the USP of Indian judiciary system. Corruption starts from this USP of Indian judiciary. Besides, other kinds of corruptions are also persisting in temple of justice. Perhap

 

Weak Anti-corruption measures in India


There is a very popular maxim, “Justice Delays, justice denied”. Nowadays this is the USP of Indian judiciary system. Corruption starts from this USP of Indian judiciary. Besides, other kinds of corruptions are also persisting in temple of justice. Perhaps due to this hard fact, the Supreme Court has reminded lately the entire courts that they can not pass an order in a case devoid of giving sufficient explanations. Disparaging the carry out of some judges to convey judgments with no ample interpretation or reserving the reckoning to one more date a bench comprising justice C.K. Thakker and D. K. Jain asked judges not to act in alacrity even as passing their ultimate commands. If the most recent array is exclusive of reason, numerous questions may perhaps take place and it will be complicated for the parties to the measures as well as the higher court to come to a decision the substance one way or the other. This court, consequently denounces the live out of articulating concluding order not including recording reasons in hold up of such order. The court observations point out towards somewhat off-putting which is going on in Indian judiciary.
Global Integrity” is an independent watchdog organization which measures the level of governance and corruption of all countries. Basically it gazes at corruption level of the world and on the foundation of anti corruption procedures it comes to a decision regarding position of nations. Governance also comes under its purview, because on the basis of affirmative and unconstructive aspects of governance, this organization decides standing of countries too.
This organization has recently released its report on the issue of governance and anti-corruption standards. Just look at the figure of the report-:
How countries are fare?
Country
Legal Framework
Practical Implementation
Implementation Gap
Overall Rank
India
88
64
24
11
Pakistan
92
50
42
21
China
75
34
41
48
United States
90
81
10
1
Now we should converse over the base .As per “Global Integrity” set of laws, accountability mechanism, media and public information are the source on which it decides the ranking of countries.
India’s anti-corruption laws achieve a pounding 100 on 100 but its citizens can not carry themselves to conviction the method and there is a excellent explanation for the “omnipresent glumness” about dishonesty, as in India anti-corruption legislation is outstanding but law enforcement is pathetic. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) also get affirmation for “being autonomous and well-staffed” but report of this origination crush the claim of CAG. Free press is still not operational at this juncture. Many newspaper and electronic media are functioning for either for business tycoons or political parties. Interestingly, both may be same as well.
Above and beyond daring journalists are also not free from fear. Honest journalists are often assaulted by hooligans, Police and administrative officials.
Elections are characteristically invested with the whole weigh down of democratic system, but since the report points out, high-quality ascendancy pivots on a lot of additional structural features. Exclusive of vocation, responsibility and precision apparatus, the structure can chip away at itself.
A liberated media, an affluent common civilization, intuitional checks and steadiness and in-house observing of dishonesty are also decisive to a well – governed nation.
India’s “reasonable” 11th rank among 55 is an amalgamation of full-bodied institutions and lack of answerability in key areas.
Judicial accountability is also feeble in India. Other predicament areas are bureaucratic preferential treatment and off-the books political financing.
Well, in this connection China and Pakistan have miserable accounts. China which completed 48th has gloomy splice evidence and Pakistan has all too many laws with negligible enforcement. The lack of recognized connection between elections and government receptiveness proposes that it may be more meaningful for crisis-ridden motherlands to spotlight on slow but sure institutional and legal enhancement as a replacement for simply fixating on how elections are held.
Even if the United States and Bulgaria scored the most outstanding states neither made the top evaluation of “extremely brawny”. Sixty per cent of the countries studied received overall rating of “feeble” or “extremely feeble”. Latvia, Spain, Japan, Italy, Romania, Canada, Costa Rica and France are also at the forefront of India, while Lebanon accomplished very last.
Overall India’s circumstance is not excellent as it should be. In numerous fronts remedial measures are mandatory. But nobody is worried about it. How we fetch development at each echelon? Corruption and development are two sides of coin. We can not convey them on similar platform. For bringing development we will have to over and done with corruption from its root. Otherwise our dream of prosperous nation will not be materialized. Having devoid of corruption, better governance will automatically come in India. If it happens, India will be the best country of world.
---SATISH KUMAR SINGH
HAJIPUR, SIRONJ, VIDISHA