2017  
  2016  
  2015  
  2014  
  2013  
  2012  
  2011  
  2010  
  2009  
  2008  
  2007  
  2006  
WGHR welcoms UN Special Rapporteur's report on arbitrary executions
Narendra Ch | 07 May 2013

The Working Group on Human Rights in India and the UN (WGHR) welcomed the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions (SREJE), Christof Heyns, on the main findings from his official visit to India in March 2012, which will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council (UN HRC) in Geneva in June 2013.

In his report, Mr. Heyns highlights that the level of extra-judicial executions in India still raises serious concerns and he recommends that the Government of India proceeds with the necessary legal reforms and policy measures in order to fight impunity, diminish the level of unlawful killings and ensure better protection of the right to life for its citizens.
 
The SR EJE states in his report that during his mission to India he received a series of complaints regarding violations of the right to life by State actors, including “deaths resulting from excessive use of force by security officers with little adherence to the principles of proportionality and necessity as defined
under international human right law standards”.
 
The SR EJE’s attention was drawn to the deaths caused by the disproportionate use of force during demonstrations, deaths occurred in police custody as well as to the imposition of death penalty in the country noting that India has recently moved to extend, rather than reduce, offences for which the death penalty may be imposed, despite the existence of a de facto moratorium on executions that had been in place since 2004.
 
 The Special Rapporteur flagged his concern on deaths caused by “fake encounters” with the police, the central armed police forces and the armed forces being accused of several incidences of this still existing practice, while endorsing the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) concerns on encounter killings that “have become virtually a part of unofficial State policy”.
 
WGHR fully endorses the SR EJE’s view that the use of force in India is exacerbated by the emergency measures in the so-called “disturbed areas” of the country, namely the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act and the related legislations. The Special Rapporteur drew attention to the AFSPA provisions
regulating the use of lethal force by any officer and the prohibition of prosecution of members of the armed forces without sanction granted by the central Government.
 
Even though the Supreme Court in 1997 enumerated precise guidelines on the use of lethal force under AFSPA, the Special Rapporteur believes that they have failed to bring AFSPA in compliance with the international standards. WGHR fully
endorsed the SR EJE’s recommendation that “India should repeal, or at least radically amend, AFSPA and the Jammu and Kashmir AFSPA, with the aim of ensuring that the legislation regarding the use of force by the armed forces provides for the respect of the principles of proportionality and necessity in all
instances, as stipulated under international human rights law. It should also remove all legal barriers for the criminal prosecution of members of the armed forces”.
 
Babloo Loitongbam, Director of Human Rights Alert, noted that, "Now that the relevant UN expert has laid out the international law position on AFSPA, it is time for the Cabinet Sub Committee on Security to take a decision without further delay". In the context of violations of the rights to life by non-State actors, the SR EJE’s referred to killings related to communal violence and expressed his concern about the lengthy and less than effective conduct of the current inquiries into events such as the 2002 Gujarat communal violence, as well as about the judicial
investigations which are hampered by the destruction of evidence, the refusal to investigate and witness intimidation.
 
Several cases of enforced disappearances and killings in Jammu and Kashmir have been brought before the SR EJE and he aptly noted that although India has signed the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, it has not ratified it as yet.
 
 Another area of concern aptly pointed out by the SR EJE, is the practices affecting women’s right to life indicating dowry-related deaths as a country wide issue with staggering numbers of occurrence. Killings of vulnerable persons belonging to scheduled castes, tribes and other marginalized communities were
also brought to the attention of the SR EJE, who underlined the importance of ensuring their protection through proper implementation of the related legislation, as well as the conduct of relevant education and awareness-raising campaigns.
 
WGHR also mentioned here that children are quite vulnerable to extra judicial killings, in conflict areas and otherwise. While the same have not found mention in Mr.Heyns’ report, WGHR urges the GoI to address the issue of protection of children in this context. Welcoming the comprehensive report of Mr. Heyns, Vrinda Grover, lawyer, expressed that, “The report identifies, institutional failures, systemic omissions and legislative lacunae, as factors responsible for the
widespread infringement of the right to life through extrajudicial executions. It casts a duty upon the Indian State and statutory bodies such as the NHRC, to undertake time bound and effective statutory and structural reforms, to curb this impunity.”
 
WGHR endorsed the SR EJE’s view that impunity represents a challenge in India at various stages of the accountability process, including the registration of FIRs, the burden of initiating civil, criminal or writ proceedings, the delay in judicial proceedings, as well as the unaccountability, immunity and impunity of
public servants. While acknowledging the work of the Indian judiciary, Mr. Heyns stressed that that the ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPROP1) “will enable individuals to hold the State responsible for all potential failures of ensuring accountability in all cases of violations, thus strengthening efforts to fight against impunity”.